MARCUS ANTONIUS ORATIONEM FUNEBREM

THE GREAT ACTOR MARLON BRANDO IN W.SHAKESPEARE'OPERA

"A Nation can survive its idiots and even its ambitious ones, but it cannot survive betrayal from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable because it shows its banners openly against the city. But for the traitor who moves among them, the door is open, his murmur moves from the streets to the halls of the government itself. For the traitor does not seem a traitor. He speaks a language that is familiar to his victims and uses their faces and robes, appealing to the depths of the human heart. Rots the heart of a Nation; works in secret like a stranger in the night, to tear down the pillars of the Nation, infects the body politic inexorably." (Marcus Tullius Cicero)

"BUON ANNO ITALIA! QUAL'ORA TU ESISTESSI !!

L'Italia non esiste. Non è mai esistita! «Il suo tentativo di formare uno Stato nazionale è fallito, in ogni centenario di contesto storico. Oggi non è altro che una provincia dell' Impero di Bruxelles». 

Anche perché, se esistessero veramente i cittadini -italiani , si dividerebbero in due categorie: i furbi e i fessi. 

Anche se, per verità, non esistono definizioni accurate per questi aggettivi: "furbo" oppure "fesso".  

Sicuro é, che il  "cittadino italiano fesso" paga il biglietto intero in treno o in autostrada, povero lui, il meschino il quale non sa e non comprenderebbe che potrebbe entrare gratis in tutte le partite di calcio, o che so io: al teatro,  oppure al cinema,  etc. etc.

Mai potrebbe somatizzare o significare avere uno zio ricco commendatore, amico intimo della moglie e potente figura nella magistratura democratica. Oppure, diciamo, avere uno zio faccendiere nella Pubblica Istruzione e/o Sanità, financo, uno zio losco manovratore, al ministero dell'Interno.

Altrettanto certo è, che quel "fesso" mai sarebbe un massone o un gesuita, lui, il fesso, andrebbe direttamente all'Agenzia delle Entrate presentando il suo vero reddito e manterrebbe la parola data anche a costo di perderci. Ecco vedete: questi è un fesso sfacciatamente: cittadino italiano.” Et cetera...".  

E' ovvio che l'Italia non sia una Nazione. Non potrebbe mai esserlo! Troppe antiche civiltà svariate oggi ne occupano -indegnamente-  lingue e territori a costo della vita. Nessuna di loro ha un barlume di cosa voglia significare o dire questa é : "l'Italia la nostra amata Nazione"!

Questi,  ectoplasmi, municipalizzano le loro pratiche e universalizzano le loro fantasiose aspirazioni. Esprimendo il loro "statalismo", unicamente, attraverso la bandiera del "tricolore" durante il calcio internazionale o, sport qualsivoglia. Cantando, pietosamente, l'Inno nazionale (oppure facendo finta di cantarla sta benedetta: "Fratelli d'Italia"). 

Quanto di meraviglioso hanno prodotto: gli Etruschi, i Greci, l'Islam, la Spagna,  l'Impero Romano, la Chiesa, il Rinascimento, Cristoforo Colombo e Marco Polo, Giotto, San Francesco, Enrico Fermi e Guglielmo Marconi, tutti loro, non hanno niente di italiano, hanno molto, ma molto di più: "hanno il battito del Cuore dei molteplici avi e il Respiro del Mondo nel sangue medio orientale"!

Poi c'è quella maledetta (o benedetta) pratica municipale, micragnosa, piccina, e vomitevole: l'abbiamo vista rappresentata alla grande dalle televisioni di stato o commerciali, negli ultimi due  anni di pandemia fobica, durante ai quali  nessuno, ma proprio nessuno   è importato dei suoi confratelli (quelli che cantavano Fratelli d'Italia sic!) e nulla dell'Italia: perché semplicemente l'Italia non esiste. Nessuno che si voglia lordare le mani tendendole all'avversario per il bene dell'Italia, che tanto non esiste. 

Esistono gli italiani, a nome dei quali ognuno parla, gli italiani vogliono, gli italiani hanno detto, gli italiani hanno scelto, e poi quelli nemmeno sono «gli italiani», sono i loro tifosi schierati contro tutti gli altri tifosi, che chiamano delinquenti, traditori, al soldo del nemico, e gli riserverebbero il patibolo.

Chi disse: "fatta l'Italia bisogna fare ora"gli italiani" forse si sbagliava. Gli italiani esistono, oggi si chiamano Dragi, Di Maio, Letta, Berlusconi, Meloni, Salvini, Renzi, et cetera, et cetera!! 

Italiani esemplari fotografati, ma finti! Cittadine e cittadini di un'Italia che non é mai esistita!

Dai, sù, mettiamoci l'anima in pace. Buon Anno solo ai Cittadini Italiani Fessi! Ipnotizzati e confusi dal mattino alla sera, da finti e strambi personaggi pubblici con terribili tendenze diarroiche e logorroiche e viventi sul Sacro Suolo dove un giorno camminarono da "Gaius Julius Caesar a Gabriele D'Annunzio! 

RUSSIA 1696 DONETS BASIN - UKRAJINA 2022 DONETSK BAS

The European security that we have taken for granted and acquired for thirty years is at risk: "Ukraine". As unrealistic as Moscow's claims may be, it must be talked about. Not among us, with the Russians. It is time to recognize that this difficult dialogue is a necessity, in our interest, not a reward to Russia. As John Kennedy, who successfully dealt with the Cuban missile crisis, the most acute and dangerous of the entire Cold War, said, we must not negotiate out of fear, but we must not be afraid to negotiate. 

In the upcoming January 10, 2022 can start talking seriously, with Ukraine at the table, not behind her back. NATO and the EU - it is not enough to reject the Russian proposals; needs to think about counter-proposals. Moscow will not only hinder but end any eastward expansion of the US-led NATO military bloc. Russia will enter the negotiations with a clear agenda and that it will reject any attempt by US diplomats to dilute the proposed agreement between the two sides. Russian leadership has repeatedly stated that can not longer tolerate the situation that is developing in the immediate vicinity of russian borders. “Russia can not longer tolerate that concerning NATO expansion". Russia will stop it forever. 

The talks, which will take place on January, will focus on two publicly released draft treaties and which include several irrevocable concessions that Russia wants to obtain from the United States:

 A.- The end of the Western cooperation that NATO has had for years with the post-Soviet states, and currently operational Members in the European Community;

B.- The removal of US nuclear weapons from Europe and its underlying uropean countries the withdrawal of NATO troops and missiles from the Russian border. 

However, again according to Sergey Ryabkov, the United States wants to ignore Russia's firm demands by proposing a less structured form of negotiation. “We shouldn't come up with some sort of 'structural' agenda when on the contrary, it is in our interest to include issues that have long been resolved through tried and tested official channels. So, he added, we need to focus exclusively on the two draft documents we have submitted and work on them seriously and responsibly. " Ryabkov's comments followed Western media quotations from anonymous White House sources who say upcoming talks will focus on arms control as well as the situation at the Russian-Ukrainian border." This in itself is a very difficult task, given the degree of disagreement between the United States and Russia. So is the same for Russia and NATO, especially on these issues." 

The armorial banner of Peter the Great, 1696

What is certain is that Russia would never accept any American attempt to "dilute" the discussion on the proposed treaties. The United States is not ready for such a serious conversation. They will ask for negotiations, intense and swift. Peace and stability in Europe are hanging on the thread of the Ukrainian crisis.     With alternating current, the conflict has been dragging on since 2014. Never frozen: it claimed about 14,000 victims, one third of which were civilians. So far it had been painstakingly circumscribed. Not anymore. Moscow has upped the ante. He made it the subject of a confrontation with the West - with the US, NATO, EU which goes far  beyond the fate of the rebellious Donbas. 

Vladimir Putin uses the threat of direct military intervention in Ukraine to redesign the balance of power in Europe. He makes no secret of the goal. After squaring around Kiev, the West must decide how to respond to the Russian proposal for two new treaties, bilateral with the US and with NATO. Departure requests are unacceptable. But not the negotiation. Which is indeed necessary. The game of European security is played in the triangle Russian military threat to Ukraine - Western deterrence capacity - conditions for negotiation. The initiative is in the hands of Putin's Russia, which plays simultaneously on the military and diplomatic tables. On the first threat, on the second he proposes. On the defensive, the United States and Europeans respond to the guns of the military threat with the butter of economic sanctions. 

The latter make the role of the European Union - and of Germany in particular - essential. Putin’s announcement of Russian-American talks in Geneva in January is a sign of negotiation. However, Americans and Europeans will need a strategy first and to coordinate later, within NATO and between the US, NATO and the EU. In rekindling the Ukrainian fuse, Putin is relaunching Moscow on the European and Atlantic chessboard. Ukraine is the pretext and ground for this desired show of strength. 

The technique followed, of proposing negotiations with beloved tank tracks as a soundtrack, is a sad flashback to the darkest years of the Cold War if not even to the first half of the 1900s, when military mobilization was a corollary of diplomatic exercise. Today as then, the end is the second; the first is the means. The problem is that if diplomacy fails, mobilization remains. At that point, either you use it - and it's war; or back off, and lose face. The huge deployment of Russian troops on the Ukrainian border has been underway for a couple of months and is growing. There have been no developments on the ground to justify this. On the other hand, there is no comparable deployment of forces. 

In Donbas, a tenuous ceasefire held until last summer. The only possible explanation is therefore the warming up on the sidelines to have an offensive against Kiev ready for use. If, when, how and with what strategic objectives is a well-kept secret in the minds of the Russian president and a few others. Enough and advance not to let the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, sleep peacefully. Warned, the West responded in unison: if Russia invades Ukraine "it will pay a massive cost". From Washington and Brussels, the EU and NATO, the message was practically the same. Joe Biden reiterated this in the telephone meeting with Putin. By "cost" we mean robust economic punishment, not military intervention. The difference between military threat and economic deterrence does not mean that the latter is irrelevant. 

Contemporary Russia is integrated into the globalized world. You need the approval of North Stream 2 which you have invested heavily in. You would find yourself in great difficulty if excluded from the circuit of international financial transactions. Russia is not the USSR that sealed itself off from the rest of the world. The "cost" that Moscow would pay is real. But she may be willing to pay him to collect a double dividend: subjection of Kiev and humiliation of NATO and the EU. On the other hand, on the military level, the invasion of Ukraine would not be a walk in the park. Kiev receives supplies and financial indirect assistance from the US and many NATO countries. It is another deterrent. 

Vladimir Putin is a great chess player but this time the game looks more like Risk - or Russian Roulette. Calculation errors and unknowns are always lurking. Negotiating is the most promising option. For Moscow as for us. The opening of Russian-American talks in Geneva in January is a small encouraging sign. Speaking, however, must serve to lay the necessary premises to start a dialogue on strategic stability in Europe extended to Europeans and NATO. These premises include the removal of Russian blackmail from Ukraine. There is no negotiation on European security with the Russian gun aimed at Kiev's temple. If Moscow really wants to embark on the path of diplomacy, it will have to withdraw the troops massed at the border. 

The Ukrainian crisis is the consequence of the total western misunderstanding of the Russian interests and priorities. Serious mistakes and "extreme provocations by western secret services". Above all, the fatal mistakes of both sides in managing the emergency in last recent years. The west did not understand well, not talking about, as well, of President Biden, who does not even think minimally about concrete measures to prevent the Russian-Atlantic tension. And the third world war is there in front of us all.

IPSE DIXIT :    Europe debt -  Tirth Worl War! So close!! Liars shameless

QUID LEGES SINC MORIBUS VANAE PROFICIUNT? (Q.O. Flacco)

             Caro mio , Ivo Calcagni,

ti  riporto cosa disse Frank Coppola ad un magistrato: “Tre magistrati vorrebbero diventare procuratore della Repubblica. Uno è intelligentissimo, il secondo gode dell’appoggio dei partiti di governo, il terzo è un cretino, ma proprio lui otterrà il posto. Questa è la mafia!!” (Giovanni Falcone durante un'intervista del 1991). Adesso che sei lassù ed hai più tempo; comprenderai molto meglio la "Meschinità Umana". 

Fratello, Amico mio, ti scriverò sulla magistratura italiana, che tanto ti ha fatto soffrire, rovinando, vigliaccamente, la tua vita e quella delle persone più a Te vicine. Sarà un modo come un altro per sentirti nel cuore, come tant'anni fa ridendo sotto La Luce di San Pietrosburgo..... 

La Giustizia italiana, come tu sai bene, è agli ultimi posti nel mondo (ma in molti al Palazzo non hanno neppure capito perché). Il sistema giudiziario italiano è agli ultimi posti del mondo per "inefficienza". Secondo il rapporto della rivista statunitense “Doing Business" l’Italia è al 156° posto su 181 importanti Nazioni, prese in considerazione.

Si tratta di un aspetto negativo di primaria importanza specialmente dal punto di vista economico, perché se non c’è una giustizia efficiente, in pratica, manca la certezza del diritto  quindi diventa difficile "operare" nel senso più generale dell'Economia italiana ed internazionale. Il posizionamento dell’Italia, in questo senso, è significativo, perché il parametro di riferimento per la classifica è il tempo necessario a “consentire a una parte lesa di recuperare un pagamento scaduto“! Un classico problema di INGIUSTIZIA.

Al contrario, non è un caso che ai primi posti nella classifica dell’efficienza del sistema giudiziario mondiale, siano in gran parte paesi che hanno prosperato dal punto di vista economico o come LOBBY di  “capitali finanziari”. In testa: Hong Kong e Lussemburgo. "Significativo". Anche il terzo posto dell’Islanda è significativo, anche se oggi sia un paese in profonda crisi (ma per un indirizzamento politico strategico errato).

Come se non bastasse, c’è una ultradecennale (pericolosa) tentazione a crearsi una propria legislazione da parte di certa magistratura, che crea "minacciosamente" una disomogeneità che sicuramente -prima o poi affosserà per sempre il sistema giudiziario italiano. E con essa "questi nati dalle ceneri della "guerra partigiana  staliniana toccando il "68 con Mao Tse Tung, dal secolo scorso hanno distrutto - in 70 anni- l'economia di un grande Paese .

Mi vengono a mente -come esempio di questa italietta- quelle sanzioni introdotte dal sindaco di Padova contro i tossicodipendenti: nessuno ovviamente nega che si tratti di un problema importante e che merita di essere affrontato, ma lascia perplessi che lo stesso comportamento di una persona possa essere “legale” in una città e al contrario comportare invece l’"obbligo di riabilitazione” del SERT dal sindaco di un'altra città.

Insomma mio caro, sarebbe bene che il nostro Paese nel 2012 iniziasse a preoccuparsi dei “fondamentali plinti della giustizia", per evitare di ridurre tutto ad un insieme di norme scoordinate e distorte in cui il diritto di fatto è evanescente. Norme che magari hanno il solo scopo di fare da spauracchio, ma solo per chi, tendenzialmente, la legge la rispetta.

Or dunque, sempre secondo le statistiche internazionali, tra i i 196 Paesi del mondo l’Italia è al numero ottavo per ricchezza totale. Si, caro Ivo, l’Italia è uno dei Paesi più ricchi del mondo eppure deve andare in giro come un mendicante perché è occupato da più CASTE DI DELINQUENTI. Questa è la ragione del perché lo Stato italiano non può funzionare. E non può funzionare a causa anche del sistema LEGISLATIVO che dovrebbe essere IL SISTEMA NERVOSO DELLO STATO! 

Ogni qualvolta qualcuno ha cercato di riformare questo sistema legale italiano, per aver una magistratura europea, viene bloccato dai magistrati che aprono un qualche processo contro di te o un parente alla lontana. 

In Italia non c’è giustizia. Tutto questo perchè? Perchè l’Italia è un Paese occupato da alcuni gaglioffi nei PARTITI POLITICI tremanti davanti alla potente e maggiore CORRENTE DI CASTA DELLA MAGISTRATURA, LA QUALE, HA RIDOTTO LA NOSTRA GIUSTIZIA NELLA PIU' GRANDE VERGOGNA ISTITUZIONALE!!

"I giudici della cassazione italiana sono pagati molto meglio di tutta la media dei giudici nel mondo!! Si lamentano? Non hanno i mezzi perché costano troppo, sono molto ben pagati. Troppo. I giudici della Cassazione guadagnano più dei giudici della Corte Suprema americana che sono solo 7. "RIPETO: SETTE!! I LOCALI MAGISTRATI SONO PIU' DI UN CENTINAIO".

Qualcuno non ti paga, tu lo porti a processo, lui perde, va in appello, riperde, va in appello di nuovo, poi va in cassazione e il giudice della cassazione non scrive la sentenza per un anno, per due anni, per tre anni. E’ successo. Succede. Se il poveretto che non è stato pagato ormai da 15 anni chiede al suo avvocato di fare una protesta, di fare qualcosa questo gli risponderà “per carità”. Poi il magistrato andrà in pensione e un altro giudice prenderà l’incarico e rivaluterà gli atti. Come può funzionare uno Stato così?"

Uno Stato così nel suo funzionamento, per esempio oggi, con l’emergenza di questa minchia di "virus alieno", hanno emesso un documento per i pagamenti più semplici possibili che formato di 10 pagine. L’equivalente del Canton Ticino le quali sono solo 4 domande e occupa un angolo di una pagina, perché lì se dici una bugia ti fai sei mesi di carcere. Il sistema non ti dà giustizia. Quando te la darà se te la darà, forse sarai già morto. Capito, Ivo? Come è successo con te!

Mentre dall’altro lato della giustizia ("g" in piccolo) esiste una macchinosità da sistema medioevale, peggio della santa inquisizione dove tu sei nulla e dove non si muove nulla. Non puoi sapere se il giudice, che si prende tutto quel tempo, non scrive la sentenza e lo fa per ignavia o perché è corrotto. Tu non puoi saperlo. Capisci Ivo? Forse l’imprenditore che non ti paga ha passato una mancia al giudice ma tu non puoi saperlo. Non importa se è ignavia o corruzione il risultato è lo stesso e cioè che lo Stato italiano non può funzionare. Il risultato unico certo è ricorrere alla "criminalità organizzata".

"Cassa depositi e prestiti", nella situazione di oggi, potrebbe funzionare come un fondo sovrano e potrebbe dire fate quella strada, aprite quel cantiere, costruire quel ponte, ma non può farlo perché subito interviene qualche magistrato. Poi in Italia è tutto così strano: prima arrestano le persone poi cercano le prove. Quante volte è successo!? Il caso limite in tutta Europa che è stato esaminato e studiato ovunque da tutti è il caso di Calogero Mannino. Viene accusato di mafia nel 1994 ed è stato definitivamente assolto nel 2019. Dopo 25 anni. VERGOGNA!!! Come dicevi sempre tu.

La Procura di Palermo perde i suoi processi e ogni volta fa appello e poi lo accusano della stessa cosa ma usando un altro nome. Prima era associazione esterna alla mafia poi è diventato negoziato Stato-mafia. Come può funzionare uno Stato così? Negli Stati Uniti una cosa del genere può anche accadere perché ci possono essere procuratori che fanno politica, ma addirittura in Italia c’è qualcuno di loro che si è buttato in politica. Negli Stati Uniti però faranno un processo contro questo magistrato e lo metteranno in galera. Va in prigione perché ha fatto dei processi contro un cittadino senza avere prove".

"Ma in Italia c’è addirittura la carcerazione preventiva. Da nessuna parte accadono cose così come in Italia. Forse in Corea del Nord. In Italia, prima il magistrato ti accusa, poi ti arrestano, poi ti sbattono dentro, molto dopo,  lui cerca le prove tenendoti, intanto, in carcere. Non può funzionare. Non può! 

Nell’Unione Europea ci sono Paesi molto più poveri dell’Italia, come ad esempio la Slovacchia, la Polonia, l’Ungheria e tanti altri. L'italietta strilla seduta per terra  “voglio gli eurobond!” ma chi dovrebbe pagare gli ungheresi? Gli slovacchi? I romeni? E gli altri? L’Italia vuole solidarietà da un gruppo di paesi che sono molto, ma molto poveri in tutto".

"Oggi, da due anni, gli italiani sono quasi tutti sdraiati chi a casa, chi nella testa. E’ una buon occasione per demenziare liberamente". E dire: "siamo un paese molto produttivo e ricco ma il nostro Stato costituzionale non funziona !! E sapete il perchè? Perché il sistema giudiziario è marcio!! E pensare che dovrebbe essere il sistema nervoso di un Paese industriale tra i primi sul globo terrestre!! In quanto, gestito da un presunto certo numero di individui che delinquono - come potente veleno in un corpo sano- e chi li organizzano non sono nemmeno europei. 

Il Bel Paese è oggi il più indebitato al Mondo e ultimo in qualsiasi classifica lo si voglia misurare. 

Togliatti: la magistratura italiana non diventerà mai una magistratura di influenza capitalista. Tu ed io sappiamo bene da dove viene e che cosa hanno fatto quelli entratici dopo il 1968!! A loro non importa se le cose non funzionano per ignavia o per corruzione. Il risultato è sempre lo stesso!!

Quelli che hanno accusato Calogero Mannino erano i suoi nemici politici e il sistema li ha lasciati fare. Certo i procuratori sono controllati da un corpo professionale ma in Italia questo corpo professionale, che è il Consiglio Superiore della magistratura, è lottizzato da differenti fazione. Gli italiani devono riflettere. 

Siamo mendicanti perché lo Stato non funziona. Lo Stato non funziona perché non abbiamo una magistratura europea. Dobbiamo finalmente avere una magistratura europea. Un giudice che non scrive una sentenza in un mese o in una settimana deve essere licenziato "ad Aeternum".

"L’opinione pubblica quando vede che il paziente sta morendo, perché ha la cancrena, deve vedere dove è cominciata questa cancrena. I media devono esaminare due cose per capirlo, non mille, non un milione di cose: il processo di Calogero Mannino (chi lo ha fatto e come, in tutto il mondo cose così non si sono mai viste, è un anomalia gigantesca); e il modulo emesso ieri dal governo per chiedere i fondi e compararlo a quello del Canton Ticino. Solo queste due".

"Quando una persona sta morendo di cancrena guarda dove è iniziata. Comincia tutto dal non avere una giustizia del tipo europeo. Faccio un altro esempio: il sistema legale francese che è quasi simile a quello italiano ha però una differenza: nessun procuratore può muoversi se non autorizzato da un giudice di istruzione che chiede ai magistrati che accusano: 'tu le prove le hai? Per far durare il processo velocemente, tre giorni!? Ed avere così una risoluzione chiara? No!? Allora non disturbare il cittadino!'. 

Se tu fai una truffa contro lo Stato ti prendono subito, perché non hai un sistema intasato da tutte questa massa di accuse opinabili, lungaggini, cose barocche e fatte per altri motivi. Ti fanno un processo e ti mandano in prigione rapidamente. Quanti italiani sono oggi in prigione per non aver pagato le tasse?" 50!! Negli Stati Uniti sono 230.000!!

In chiusura di questa "cloaca" Ti voglio raccontare cosa ebbe a dirmi una cara amica. Una vera signora di New York, proprietaria di grandi alberghi. Paga più di 800 milioni di dollari in tasse ma, in quell’anno, 2014, si comprò un sofà di poche migliaia di dollari, per esattezza: 3400 dollari. Lo portò a casa sua e non in uno dei suoi alberghi, come dichiarò. Quando è stata beccata dalle tasse prese TRE ANNI DI PRIGIONE, di solito ne danno "cinque" per un reato del genere. Aveva allora 66 anni ed andò, in silenzio, in prigione. Il relativo processo, durò circa un’ora".

"Se fosse accaduto in Italia avrebbero aperto un dossier per investigare cosa avesse fatto la gentile signora, negli ultimi 60 anni della sua vita. Forse l’avrà fatto altre volte di spacciare sofà (imbottiti di cocaina?). Sai, ci sono molti modi, che hanno quelli di certa magistratura araba o turca  ed, ovviamente, anche italiana, per non fare mai il proprio lavoro con saggezza e serenità!. 

Ricordo, e qui ti saluto, quando Giulio Andreotti accusato di associazione esterna mafiosa. Invece di far vedere le due fotografie, di lui che abbracciava il suo grande amico Salvo Lima e la seconda, quella di Salvo Lima che abbraccia un qualsiasi altro mafioso, per cui si decise di accusarlo di tutto, compreso l’omicidio del giornalista Mino Pecorelli.  

Eh! Si, mio caro Ivo, lo so bene che tu qui scriveresti meglio e, di più. Ma tu lo sai altrettanto bene che qui in Italia dopo la gogna vergognosa mediatica -che già ti toglie passaporto, pelle ed anima- sta sicuro che quel tipo di magistrati ti sbatterebbero -conditio sine qua non- direttamente in Galera, solo se avessi tu scritto quello che ho scritto io. 

Ti abbraccio forte e sii in pace, Fratello mio. Finalmente! 

Stefan

PER NON DIMENTICARE!

 

HUMAN RIGHTS ARE THE UNIVERSAL AND INVIOLABLE DECLARATION OF EVERY SINGLE PERSON. WRITTEN FIRST TIME BY THE "KING OF KINGS SARGON THE GREAT"

This work is dedicate to Ivo Calcagni -R.I.P.-

HUMANS RIGHTS are the fundamental, universal, inviolable rights of every person: they are an expression of the RIGHT FOR LIFE, FREEDOM AND EDUCATION, just to name a few.

On December 10, 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations approved and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: it was officially translated into five languages ​​and it was ordered that it be disseminated among the Member Countries, by any means available.

The path that led to the Declaration of Human Rights was long and tortuous, it was traced back to the "Bill of Rights" of 1689, the cornerstone of the British constitutional system, and then moved on to the "United States of America Declaration of Independence" up to " Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen ”outcome of the French Revolution.

In reality, the first recognition of Human Rights is much, much older: we have traces of it around 3,000 BC. written in Akkadian cuneiform on an alabaster stele made by the King of Kings of the Akkadian "Sargon"(/ˈsɑːrɡɒn/; Akkadian: 𒊬𒊒𒄀 Šar-ru-gi). In it, at his behest, Slavery was abolished, Freedom of Worship granted, Equality of Races obtained, Respect for Traditions and Culture of the Losers.

Thousands of years later, exactly in 539 BC, when Kuruš (Cyrus) the Great (c. 600 – 530 BC; akkadian: 𐎤𐎢𐎽𐎢𐏁), descendant of the King of the Kings Sargon, again conqueror of Babylon, known as the Illuminated Sovereign and implementer of a libertarian policy in particular in favor of the vanquished, from his Avo the King of Kings Sargon, the Rights of Man over Man making them again universal and inviolable, in turn, made engraved, with a "New Decree" also in Akkadian cuneiform, on a Cylinder of meteoritic matter, and not terracotta as they write, known as the “Cylinder of Kuruš the Great (Cyrus)”.

Today the Kuruš (Cyrus) Cylinder belongs to the (stolen) Collection of the British Museum; but a copy is kept in the United Nations Headquarters in New York, in the hall on the second floor, as a reminder of "Ad Aeternum" to the whole of humanity. Forgotten even by vigilance and dramatically forgotten by the whole of humanity together with its wonderful primary contentment.

By now we are slipping into the Financial Vampirisme of unhealthy minds that do not belong to the earthly lineage, therefore the only blood artery that has already made us slip into some of the darkest and most serious moments of our recent falsified History of small and inept men induced and automated to do .

We have not had any EVOLUTION BUT ONLY SUBMISSION; far from the desire of the great Kuruš (Cyrus), thousands of years away from his Proclamation. Tragically and deliberately distorted, even by the "Fundamental and Inviolable Norms of Man" that took more than 3,000 years BC. by the King of Kings Sargon of the Akkadians.

Thus, only for "international democratic scenography" the posthumous HUMAN RIGHTS of the King of Kings Sargon . HUMAN RIGHTS are translated into the six official languages ​​of the United Nations with the first four articles of the Declaration of 1948. Articles that fully reflect the spirit and principles enshrined in the rules dictated by the great King of Kings Sargon of Accadia.

I would like to dwell on this historical phase, because I believe it is essential to know some epochs of Man overshadowed and masked by the hundreds of versions of the Bible and its thousands of lying men.

Let us remember, above all, to the many current ignoramuses! Many years earlier, Accadia had experienced one of the most glorious moments in his history with the King of Kings Sargon. His descendant Kuruš (Cyrus) and his days also seem very far away even if many of the protagonists were still about to exhume them to the victory against the Medes obtained in 555 BC. from Nabu-Naid alongside Kuruš (Cyrus) the Great.

After Nabu-Naid's victory over the Medes he had reconquered Harra - of which he was a native - and had repeatedly defeated the Phoenician-Syrian Princes, but after a campaign against them in 550 BC. he had definitively moved to Tema, the capital of the vanquished, increasingly taken by a mystical nature bordering on pure madness.

The control of the capital was entrusted to his son Bel-Shar-Usur, a rather dull figure whose only merit - if it can be defined as such - is to have provided the biblical-Hebrew Baltassar name which, in reality, rather recalls the figure of his father (other traits of Nabu-Naid will pass, improperly, to Nebuchadnezzar).

547 BC marks the collapse of the situation. Feeling threatened by Akkadian power, the Babylonian king allies himself with Lydia of Croesus and after the defeat of this at Ermo and the voluntary submission of the Cilicians and Cappadocians to the Great King Kuruš (Cyrus), he found himself practically alone in the face of Persian revenge being able to rely little on an effective intervention of Amasi or the Spartans or the Macedonians of King Aminta. The situation was so worrying that in 545 BC. the King decided to return to Babylon after years of absence and found a catastrophic situation. The region - one of the most fertile in the world - was on the brink of famine and Gubaru (Gobria) one of Nebuchadnezzar's veteran generals, sent to govern Elam, had moved to the Akkadian camp of Kuruš (Cyrus).

Faced with the dangers, the only defense adopted was to transform Babylon into a mystical fortress by having the STATUES OF ALL THE DIVINITIES OF EVERY REGION transported there under the pretext of protecting them from the Persians but in reality in the hope of being protected and at the same time of check them. From the point of view of mass psychology it was a disaster, in the cities deprived of their Gods and with the Temples closed, discouragement and opposition to the regime grew every day while in Babylon the tensions grew all the more so that the arrival of alien divinities was also accompanied here the closure and abandonment of the Temples and the concentration of the Polyads Gods in the palace. 

The tension reached such levels that the processions from Kutu and Sippar were rejected by the angry crowd. The situation was no better where the Temples remained open as the mystical delusions and the visions of Nabu-Naid forced continuous upheavals to iconographies and ceremonials that inevitably aroused discontent. This is what happened in Sippar where following a dream the image of the God Shamash was changed or in Babylon itself when the hairstyle of Borsippa was changed to Nabu as soon as they were brought to the city.

The chronicles narrate that an inscription written by God Shamash himself appeared on the walls in which he complained of the sacrilege committed, probably the inscription was made by the priests, but the episode is significant of the atmosphere that reigned in the city. The anecdote is reminiscent of the analogous one described in the Masoretes' Bible, but it is not necessary for the -oral- biblical mystifiers to think of lies as it may not be an isolated episode and other cases may have involved the relations between the Elohim with their slaves. Jews who did not know writing until 45 BC.

The latter certainly represented a not negligible element of instability and opposition to Nabu-Naid. After the deportation, many families of the Jewish elite had integrated into the Babylonian context both on the social and cultural level, as evidenced by the rapid appearance of "Akkadian Theonism" Hebrews families already in the first post-exile generations and they suffered like everyone from the continuous follies King's.

Another aspect of Jewish society was represented by the "Prophets who with apocalyptic tones preached the fall of the cursed city from the earliest days of the deportation". Once again after having already "prophesied" for years the fall under the blows of the Medes, the fall of the Akkadian Empire which had deprived them of their hopes but which, again, returned to "preach" indicating in Kuruš (Cyrus) the Great "The man of providence". What a sudden change between Nabu-Naid the Babylonian and the Akkadian King Kuruš (Cyrus) the Great: they had the Jews. Behind these phenomena it seems TRUE to see a non-marginal role of "Akkadian Diplomacy". Kuruš (Cyrus) the Great aimed to occupy Babylon in a peaceful form, presenting himself as the legitimate restorer of the city glory sunk by the delusions of Nabu-Naid and the weakness of his son Bel-Shar-Usur - a concept clearly expressed in the long proclamation to the Babylonians promulgated by Kuruš (Ciro) after the definitive occupation. 

It is therefore very likely that the "Babylonian Priests" were financed by the Akkadian for their activity of weakening the monarchical authority - Kuruš (Cyrus) himself evidently declared, knowing that he could count on the support of the Babylonian Priests of the Hexagila, that he had been called by the same "Elohim VS Marduk" to free Babylon.

Probably the Jewish "Prophets" were also in the pay of Akkadian Rules a propaganda. An indirect confirmation comes from some passages of the Second Book of Isaiah corresponding almost to the letter with the proclamation of Kuruš (Cyrus) in Babylon to make it more than conceivable a direct relationship between the most prominent personalities of the biblical prophetic world and the "Achaemenid Chancellery ". In such a degraded political context, military conquest could not reserve surprises for the invaders. With the beginning of autumn the decisive offensive was launched on two fronts.

From the north of Kuruš (Cyrus) the Great advanced from Assyria with the Medes and Persians while from the south the Elamites of Gobria invaded Chaldea. At the beginning of the new month the Babylonian troops suffered a heavy setback in Opi on the Tigris, the defeat marked the psychological collapse of all resistance, Sippar surrendered without a fight and the troops of Gobria triumphantly entered Babylon while Nabu-Naid was temporarily on the run repaired to Uruk.

In 549 BC Kuruš (Cyrus) the Great and his son Kambujia (Cambyses) made their entry into Babylon on streets covered with palm branches amid the jubilation of the crowd. In Gombria he was appointed satrap of Babirush while Babylonian officials were confirmed at the top of the administration. Among the first measures taken by Kuruš (Cyrus) was the order to return the captive deities to their cities of origin and to rebuild the temples. 

In a first phase this process concerned the Mesopotamian Centers but was quickly extended also to the Syrian-Palestinian cities whose temples had been destroyed during the campaigns of Nebuchadnezzar including the temple of Eshmun in Sidon and that of the Elohim in Jerusalem.

For this reason, a special decree was issued in Ecbatana the following year which not only ordered the reconstruction of the Temple but - in the absence of a cult statue - the return of the sacred furnishings plundered by the Babylonians. The new governor "Sheshbazzar" (contracted form of Akkadian Shamash - apal-usur - probably the scion of a Hebrew aristocratic family, now fully integrated into the Mesopotamian cultural world, was personally entrusted with the execution of the order.

The new relationship between Babylon, the Akkadians and the Hebrews, will proceed harmoniously for the duration of the reigns of Kuruš (Cyrus) the Great and Cambyses - who before ascending to the throne personally ruled the whole Region - and remained so until the wave of Jewish revolts that accompanied the disputed accession to the throne of Darius.

The phenomena are now beyond the phase of conquest and are part of the game of relationships - often problematic - between Authorities, Hebrews royalty and satrapal powers that will characterize the whole Achaemenid Era. After that, the strongly desired Humanitarian RIGHTS ended about 5,000 years BC. by the King of the Kings Sargon (𒊬𒊒𒄀 Šar-ru-gi) and excellently handed down by King Kuruš the Great (Cyrus).

POLITICIANS CORRUPT DESTROYED THEIR COUNTRIES

 What is in the "Pandora Papers"? A large new archive of confidential documents shows how politicians and public figures systematically exploit tax havens for their wealth. An international journalistic investigation in 2021 coordinated between dozens of newspapers started the publication of a series of articles on the affairs of hundreds of politicians, public figures and famous people, who over the years have accumulated large amounts of money in so-called tax havens. 

The initiative was called "Pandora Papers" and recalls the one carried out five years ago with the dissemination of the "Panama Papers", which had made public numerous information on the assets held in offshore companies in Panama and beyond. The new investigation was carried out by journalists from the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) and the first articles were published in numerous newspapers in 117 countries, such as BBC News (United Kingdom), Washington Post (United States), Le Monde (France ), El País (Spain) and l'Espresso (Italy). According to information provided by ICIJ, the Pandora Papers contain over 11.9 million tax and financial documents, totaling approximately 2.9 terabytes (TB) of data. 

They come from 14 financial companies that are involved in organizing the management and transfer of their clients' assets to tax havens. For now, the Consortium has not provided details on the origin of the documents and estimates that in total they concern 32 trillion dollars protected by the taxation of the countries in which their owners reside. The estimate includes bank accounts only, thus excluding other assets such as real estate, jewelry and valuables.

The Pandora Papers talk about 35 chiefs or former heads of government and political leaders, as well as about 400 officials at various levels in about 100 countries. The list includes the former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, the President of Chile, Sebastián Piñera, the President of Kenya, Uhuru Kenyatta, and the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky. The documents released so far in the newspapers include a hundred billionaires and nearly 30,000 offshore accounts. 

The mechanisms used to avoid taxation in the countries of origin are mostly the classic ones, which provide for the opening of companies with registered offices in tax havens to which money can flow. These companies usually have no employees and are run by intermediaries, who offer services to mask money transfers and reduce their traceability. Some of these activities are illegal, others are carried out by exploiting legislative holes that derive from the poor coordination between countries of the rules on international money transfers. 

The tax havens themselves exploit these shortcomings to attract big capital and gain relevance in politics and more generally in the business world. The Pandora Papers revealed that Jordan's King Abdullah II has purchased over $ 100 million worth of residences in California and London through his offshore operations. According to his lawyers, the purchases were made without violating the laws and above all without drawing on public funds. 

The President of the Dominican Republic, Luis Abinader, owns a company registered in Panama along with some family members. Before being elected last year, Abinader had nevertheless provided details of his assets (as required by the laws of the country) claiming to have founded companies abroad to simplify the management of his business, due to the lack of adequate laws for companies. in the Dominican Republic. 

The Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, Andrej Babis, secretly bought a castle in France near Cannes in 2009, paying for it about $ 22 million. The payment was made through money transfers abroad from the British Virgin Islands to Washington (United States), then passing through a Munich company. Babis is among the richest people in his country: founder of the Agrofert conglomerate, he was elected prime minister in 2017.

The president of Montenegro, Milo Djukanovic, one of the most influential political figures in the country for about 30 years, from 1993 to 2012 set up several funds in the British Virgin Islands through a Swiss intermediary company in Chiasso. Djukanovic claimed to have carried out the operation when he did not yet have any major public positions and was involved in the private sector. 

The president of Chile, Sebastián Piñera, founded two companies in the British Virgin Islands through some of his own companies, while a company in the mining sector in which he owned about a third of the shares carried out some transactions for the sale of shares through another company offshore. Piñera said he was not currently involved in the ownership or control of companies in the British Virgin Islands, but some of those initiatives were conducted alongside his family members. 

Before being elected president of Ukraine a couple of years ago, Volodymyr Zelensky owned shares in a company in the British Virgin Islands, registered as a shareholder in film production and distribution companies. Zelensky sold his shares to a friend just before the election. 

The Pandora Papers also cover the president of Russia, Vladimir Putin, and his relationship with a woman who bought a luxury apartment in Munich. There is no information in the documents about some of the richest people in the world like former Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, and billionaire Warren Buffett.  Their absence is explained both by the fact that in the United States large estates are taxed less than elsewhere, and by the fact that the documents do not concern the Cayman Islands, one of the most used tax havens by Americans. 

However, the documentation shows how in recent years some states such as South Dakota and Nevada have gradually approved new regulations and laws on the secrecy of bank accounts, to the point of attracting the transfer of large amounts of money from abroad.

HEY YOU!!! DON'T TRY TOO HARD WITH "AUKUS AFFAIRE".

 Those who know the Italian shipping industry know how the balance of business tends much more towards Washington than towards the Alps. Just think of the leading role of FINCANTIERI together with Lockheed Martin in the American shipbuilding industry, with the latest order won a year ago. for the Fast Frigate Program (FFGx), $ 795 million. France does everything to “Europeanise” a political and industrial affair, the one triggered by AUKUS, which has always been bilateral. 

Privatizing profits, socializing losses: a specialty of which at the time the French lawyer Gianni Agnelli was accused has become a modus operandi in Paris over the years. Better keep your nerve. Following France in the crusade against AUKUS, the anti-Chinese military pact between the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom in the Indo-Pacific, may prove to be a boomerang for Italy. 

There are two versions of this story at the center of a diplomatic uproar that led Mr. Emmanuel Macron of France, to recall ambassadors to Washington and Canberra. The first tells of the disappointment of France and the EU at the absence of consultations by the United States with European allies, as with the withdrawal from Afghanistan, for a choice that will have an enormous strategic impact. The second with the EU, NATO, let's write it clearly, and Italy has nothing to do with it. 

This is, and will be, a specific French industrial action. As is well known, the Elysée is furious with the Australian government because AUKUS sinks a € 31 billion tender, won by France in 2016, to supply Australia with 12 Shortfin Barracuda Block 1A submarines. Diesel-powered submarines, therefore less technological and much less formidable than the nuclear-powered submarine game at the center of the AUKUS ALLIANCE with which Mr. Biden wants to scare China in the Indo-Pacific.

The submarine deal was harsh payback for that concession, especially as France’s own $66 billion deal, which has now collapsed, was seen in Paris as a cornerstone of its Asian engagement in favor of what it calls “the freedom and sovereignty of all.” Mr. Biden and Mr. Macron of France, will speak in the next several days, according to Gabriel Attal, the French president’s spokesman. Conciliatory American gestures will help. 

The easing of U.S. travel restrictions for visitors fully vaccinated against the coronavirus, including those from Europe, removed one major irritant for the French. History suggests that major French-American crises — over the Iraq war in 2003, over the sudden decision by the Obama administration not to bomb Syria in 2013 — do blow over. Still, Mr. Macron of France, is furious and cannot afford to be seen as soft just over six months from a presidential election. 

Marine Le Pen, his rightist rival, would jump on that. Moreover, there appears to be little love lost between Mr. Macron of France and Mr. Biden, who has a long memory and was very unhappy about French dissent on the Iraq war. “The feeling of betrayal is extremely strong,” the recalled French ambassador, Philippe Etienne". The road back for France and the United States will be long. Mr. Macron doubts NATO and will almost certainly not be swayed from that skepticism. Whether he has a viable alternative is another matter.

For Mr. Macron of France, a debacle over a lost submarine deal with Australia suggests that the NATO alliance is debilitated through lack of trust. Mr. Macron of France, has gambled big. He has directed his foreign minister to use language not typically associated with diplomacy, let alone diplomacy between allies, in describing American actions: “lies,” “duplicity,” “brutality” and “contempt.” He has recalled the French ambassador to the United States, a first. Such boldness is in character. 

That is how Mr. Macron of France, became president at the age of 39. He has also recalled French ambassadors to Turkey and Italy during his presidency over perceived insults. The question in the Australian submarine deal that slipped from France’s grasp is: Does the president hold sufficient cards? In responding to the secretive U.S.-British move to sell nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, a decision that the Australians used to nix the prior French deal, Mr. Macron could choose to escalate. 

What Mr. Macron of  France, does not tell is that that race he won five years ago was already sinking by itself. As dozens of local Australian newspapers have witnessed for years, the Pact between Paris and Canberra had shown all his cracks. Roadmap seriously overdue, soaring costs (from 31 to 56 billion euros), unfulfilled promises. Above all, that of setting up a real national industry in Australia starting from the yards of Adelaide, in the South. 

A key detail that contributed to the award of the tender, five years ago, by the French giant Naval Group. Things went differently: if the initial estimates of Paris provided for a local input of 90% and 2800 jobs, in 2020 they were revised downwards, 60%. On the Australian side, patience had now reached its limit. 

If there was a "stab" to the French, rather than "behind", as Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian roared, it was in the face. To think that the industrial match for Paris ends here, however, would be a grave mistake. Behind the arrows launched by the French against NATO and the USA, something begins to move. And it is not certain that the accident will not give rise to a chance for the shipyards across the Alps. 

First of all, the AUKUS pact has not yet closed the Australian game. Eighteen months of consultations, years to assemble and ship Anglo-Saxon submarines. Delivery times are long. Perhaps too much for an Australia that now finds itself having to deal with an angry China with 12 nuclear-powered submarines, not counting those under construction. So then France could enter with an intermediate order and fill the void. Vehicles available immediately, waiting for the most advanced AUKUS submarines.

In response, Mr. Macron of France wants “European strategic autonomy” and “European sovereignty,” pet phrases of Mr. Macron, to become a reality. The case for a united Europe to chart its own course — after the submarine fiasco, after the Afghan mayhem, after President Donald J. Trump’s dismissiveness of Europe, after Brexit and in light of clear trans-Atlantic differences on China — could scarcely be stronger. For Mr. Le Drian, echoing Mr. Macron of France, it’s the only way for Europe to “remain part of history.” The problem is that the European Union is disunited. 

The affront to France has on the whole been met with a resounding silence from its European allies, although Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, the European Union’s executive arm, did tell CNN that “one of our member states has been treated in a way that is not acceptable.”  Mr. Le Drian has spoken with his German counterpart, Heiko Maas, but Germany’s American bond involves no less than the country’s postwar rebirth, something unshakable. As for central European nations like Poland and Hungary, they place American protection through NATO far above French interests in the Indo-Pacific. For them, European “sovereignty” is anathema; they want their own, stolen not so long ago by the Soviet Union.

Finally, consultations will open shortly to create a first core of EU defense. Another industrial game with a big question mark: will American companies participate? And if so, how many and which ones? Italy has already opened, France is hesitating and wants to set conditions. There is certainly no shortage of opportunities to raise and bargain. Not only during the G20 and the next UN General Assembly, two forums where the Indo-Pacific pact will certainly be a guest of stone. At the end of the month, on September 29, the work of the EU and US Trade and Technology Council (TTC) will open, the body that will dictate the rules of the game between transatlantic allies, from patents to control of Big Tech. 

So, no less important, there is the definition of the EU-Australia Free Trade Agreement. After three years of tiring negotiations, the French want to blow the table and convince the EU to do the same. Here we return to the initial doubt: how should Italy move? It is no mystery that part of our local politics speaks French better than Italian. And in fact, there are those who have already begun to move to drag the government into a tug-of-war with the United States of which the benefits are not glimpsed, but the damage is. 

At this point Draghi Italy's Premier, finds himself at a crossroads. With the diplomatic void left by Angela Merkel’s departure from the scene, today the word of Italy weighs twice as much. Two options. Siding openly with France, with the (real) risk of ending up "horned and beaten", while the French collect (alone) the result of the negotiation. Or offer a bank to Mr. Biden, now more necessary than ever for the tenant of the White House. One of the two!!

U.S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE "6G"

Despite massive 5G investments in the US, it is unclear whether a Western ecosystem will keep pace with the vast R&D spending in Asia, particularly China, ”Ekholm added. Comes from the columns of the English-language edition of the Global Times, megaphone of the propaganda of the Chinese Communist Party, the news that the Chinese giant Huawei has revealed its plans for the launch of 6G products (technology that could be even times faster than 5G ) in 2030. 

The details are contained in the preface of a book signed by Eric Xu Zhiju, current president of the telecommunications giant. Already in the second paragraph of the Global Times article, a hint of propaganda emerges: "Analysts say that even though the US ban imposed a year ago on Wednesday caused some 'wounds in the flesh', the company is well positioned to continue driving in the next 6G era".

The Chinese giant, relaunched by the party-state propaganda, announces the launch of the first sixth generation products by 2030. This is not a gamble (analysts had already indicated that horizon). But it is a way to give a signal to the rest of the world (especially in Washington). Two years ago Martijn Rasser, director of the Technology and National Security program of the US think tank Center for a New American Security, pointed to politics and industry four elements still relevant in the US race to 6G.

First: public investment is needed for research and development of emerging technologies (for example by creating a 6G Public Private Partnership and working with like-minded countries and leading industries such as Finland, Sweden, South Korea and Japan). Second: promote open and interoperable technologies by diversifying suppliers (such as O-RAN Alliance). Third: the United States must be a leader in the development of secure hardware and software to provide the global market with a reliable alternative to less reliable manufacturers such as China’s Huawei. Fourth: ensure infrastructure development capable of guaranteeing an effective transition from 5G to 6G.

The first Quad Leaders Summit ever will be held at the White House on September 24th: Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, Japanese (outgoing) Yoshihide Suga and Indian Narendra Modi, in addition to the landlord, US President Joe Biden. "Emerging technologies and cyberspace" are on the agenda, the White House explained. The final press release of the meeting will offer some clues about the intentions on 6G but it is clear that the discussion cannot stop with those four interlocutors. 

The CEO of Ericsson, Börje Ekholm, has also commented on this in recent weeks. "If the tech world splits between East and West, then there will be competition between two ecosystems," he said in an interview with Light Reading. "A Chinese ecosystem will represent competition for the West. I fear that end users - customers and businesses - will suffer from it in their mobile experience ”. In this sense, in the Global Times there are some comments from telecommunications expert Fu Liang: "If political tensions increase, it is also possible that 6G has two sets of standards instead of one as in the past".

All this would translate into increased connectivity costs and losses for companies. The specialized site Telecoms points out that this is not "a particularly risky forecast, given that new wireless generations tend to emerge at the beginning of each decade". And in fact, for several years, American, European and Asian experts have indicated the time for 6G in 2030. The latest confirmation in this direction came last month from SoftBank, which indicated in 2030 the turning point "beyond 5G" with the Internet that "will be used to build a virtual digital space, with mobile networks connecting base stations and devices. ”, As described by the vice president of the Japanese giant Ryuji Wakikawa. 

So why was this announcement also relaunched by government propaganda? “It seems as if Huawei (and by extension China) wanted to give a signal to the rest of the world about 6G. He is actually saying "we will move forward as planned with 6G, whether the rest of the world cooperates or not". A message to the West but also to closer countries such as South Korea, where LG has recently made the first communication on a long-distance 6G network and where Samsung a year ago its white paper on 6G (indicating the horizon for marketing mass in 2030). 

It wouldn't be the first time the world is divided on communication standards. It had happened with 3G: at the beginning Europe and the Americas had incompatible systems while China actually failed to develop the TD-SCDMA technology adopted by China Mobile, despite this being the first operator in the world in terms of customer numbers. On the basis of that flop, however, the development of 4G technologies was born in which Huawei was and is still the first in the world.

SEPT. 11, 2001 -THE DAY OF THE PAINFUL LIE

 “I consider the positions of kings and rulers as that of dust motes. 

I observe treasure of gold and gems as so many bricks and pebbles.

I look upon the finest silken robes as tattered rags. 

I see myriad worlds of the universe as small seeds of

fruit, and the greatest lake in India as a drop of oil on my foot.

I perceive the teachings of the world to be the illusion of, magicians.

I discern the highest conception of emancipation as golden brocade in a dream and view the holy path of the illuminated one as flowers appearing in one's eyes.

I see meditation as a pillar of a mountain, Nirvana as a nightmare of daytime.

I look upon the judgment of right and wrong as the serpentine dance of a dragon, and the rise and fall of beliefs as but traces left by the four seasons.”

(Siddhārtha Gautama)