Showing posts with label SOROS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SOROS. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 24


By Stefan Vlahovich - ESM and the European troika is a term used, especially in the media, to refer to the decision group formed by the European Commission (EC), the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The usage arose in the context of the "bailouts" of Cyprus, Greece, Ireland and Portugal necessitated by their prospective insolvency caused by the world financial crisis of 2007–2008.

To launch EU bonds with a common guarantee, like the Coronabonds, not even. There are even those who propose a "donation of 20 billion from Germany to Italy, as long as no automatisms are inserted at European level". The ideas of Berlin's economic gotha ​​on how to support the countries most affected by the Coronavirus epidemic are first of all a corollary of the concept of solidarity of a certain German elite, unshakable even at the dawn of a potentially catastrophic global recession.

At the Eurogroup, the economic ministers of the euro area will discuss how to deal with the crisis that is now all coming and with a disastrous impact. In a nutshell, there are two orientations in the field: a debt instrument with some form of common guarantee, such as the Coronabonds (euro area bonds sponsored by southern countries and opposed by Northern Europe contrary to any form of risk sharing) or the use of credit lines in the Mes, where necessary to be accompanied by a Eurobond but in any case linked to "conditionality", more or less stringent constraints for the countries that access financial support instruments. 

The Ministry of Finance of the Netherlands has confirmed it, another country which together with Germany and Finland is part of the so-called "rigorists", reiterating that they will undertake to "guarantee the respect of an adequate form of conditionality for each instrument as required by the current ESM Treaty ". In other words, I'll give you the money as long as I can control how you spend it, perhaps by sending the notorious troika.

Anyone who advises the German Federal Government or has done so in the past is on the Dutch line. The gift of honesty should be recognized for the former president of the prestigious IFO Hans-Werner Sinn. What the ECB is doing with the measures announced last week is to "first and foremost" help the "French and German" banks, he said on DLF radio a few days ago. 

Of course, added Sinn, help is also needed by Italy but it is clear that the interests to be protected are first and foremost German, from his point of view: “I am thinking of the huge Target debt contracted by the Italians of 400 billion euros: if Italy were not to pay, one third would be paid by Germany ". 

For this reason the economist has proposed a donation of 20 billion euros to Italy, because “we must help our Italian friends, but openly and honestly and not pretend that the EU is doing it, but if we do, they are the our money and our free choice. " The border between solidarity and charity here is blurred, what worries us most "are these automatisms that are gradually redistributing large amounts of money through the ECB, which is not authorized to do what it is doing".

A few days ago Italy, through Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, made official the request by Rome through the Financial Times to resort to the State-Saving Fund but, specifying, without any form of conditionality. The resources should be used exclusively for the health and economic emergency. It would therefore be a new tool, since there is nothing in the ESM "toolkit" that does not provide for more or less stringent forms of conditionality. 
According to the Council of Wise Men of the German Government (today made up of only three out of five members: Isabel Schnabel was also part of it until 2019, today on the ECB Executive Committee), however, there are no alternatives to resorting to the Mes with its constraints.

"The countries currently affected by the crisis should submit a request for assistance to the European stability mechanism" which could grant credit lines to countries that request it "but would be tied to conditionalities," he said a few days ago to the German financial newspaper Handelsblatt Volker Wieland, member of the Expert Council. "This would then allow the European Central Bank to purchase government bonds from individual countries through the OMT." 

An unused program which, as is well known, allows Eurotower to purchase unlimited government bonds from a country that is no longer able to finance itself on the markets. And, as is well known, it is subject to the signature by the State concerned of a Memorandum with the fund led by the German Klaus Regling, the ESM precisely.

Even the President of the Council of Wise Men Lars Feld believes that the Mes is the most appropriate tool: interviewed by the FAZ a week ago, referring to the possibility for Italy to no longer be able to finance itself, said that "there is aid from the ESM and the Frankfurt Omt program. If Italy were to get into trouble, it would have to request a State-Savings Fund program linked to conditions and reforms. "

Berlin, for its part, today approved a "historic" package of measures. Finance Minister Scholz expects "at least 5%" GDP contraction for 2020. According to the Bundesbank, the German Central Bank, there is "unprecedented uncertainty" and it is "inevitable" that Germany will sink into a severe recession. For this reason, Angela Merkel's cabinet has given the go-ahead to the "fund for the stabilization of the economy", consisting of 600 billion euros and with 400 billion credit guarantees. 
Another 100 billion are made available to guarantee liquidity to companies overwhelmed by the coronavirus crisis. A further 100 billion are allocated to the credit fund for reconstruction (KfW). For the first time, the government plan foresees a deficit of 156 billion euros. Thus the "debt brake", anchored to the German Constitution, is suspended: since 2014 the government was able to pass budget laws without debt.

The response to the Coronavirus emergency was considered, and with good reason, "historic" for the size of the intervention. It is clear to everyone that it was possible to prepare it in record time because of a public debt of less than 60% of GDP. For this reason, it is not surprising that the German measures are on a different scale than those announced by Italy, France and Spain. 

EU governments immediately moved to prepare for the arrival of the recession announced in an isolated and uncoordinated manner, postponing talks on a common eurozone response to this week. Because, as never hidden by Eurotower, it is clear that this time the ECB's weapons (among those currently available) are likely not to suffice.

According to the German economic gotha, the existing instruments are already sufficient to face an economic crisis and possibly even sovereign debt, should it move to government bonds: "The SSF can be used," said Clemens Fuest, current IFO president. "It is a tool to be carefully evaluated", but at present "its use can be justified by the situation". 
How it works has already been said: "If a country requests the assistance of the Mes, the ECB can buy government bonds from that country in unlimited quantities". But only under certain conditions. It is admitted and not granted that the ESM can be enough to counteract a crisis of which nobody has understood the real extent.

Saturday, February 29


Il 13 gennaio 2017, è morto Udo Ulfkotte.A causa di un infarto cardiaco, apparentemente, sebbene l’immediata cremazione del corpo e l’assenza di un’autopsia non mancheranno di alimentare, proprio per lui che è sempre stato descritto come un teorico della cospirazione, gravi dubbi sulle reali cause della sua morte. 

Nato nel 1960 a Lippstadt in Vestfalia studiò diritto e scienze politiche all’Università di Friburgo dove ottenne il dottorato di ricerca con una dissertazione sulla politica americana e sovietica nel Medio Oriente

Nel 1986 entrò alla redazione della Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) dove fu per anni corrispondente dall’estero ed acquisì una profonda conoscenza di decine di Paesi, specie in Medio Oriente. 

In quegli anni, così riferì lo stesso Udo Ulfkotte in un’intervista a Russia Today e nel suo recente libro dedicato al tema, egli partecipò a un diffuso sistema di corruttela dei giornalisti tedeschi,indotti da prebende e pressioni a diffondere notizie la cui finalità non era tanto quella di raccontare la verità, quanto quella…di Alessandro Fusillo

Wednesday, November 28


This is a chapter-by-chapter analysis and documentation of the power of Israel via the Israeli, Jewish or Pro-Zionist Lobby on US Middle East policy. 

It raises serious questions as to the primary beneficiary of US policy, and its destructive results for the United States. The extraordinary extent of US political, economic, military and diplomatic support for the state of Israel is explored, along with the means whereby such support is generated and consolidated. Contending that Zionist power in America ensured unconditional US backing for Israeli colonization of Palestine and its massive uprooting of Palestinians, it views the interests of Israel rather than those of Big Oil as the primary cause of the disastrous US wars against Iraq and threats of war against Iran and Syria. It demonstrates and condemns US imitation of Israeli practice as it relates to conduct of the war on terrorism and torture. It sheds light on the AIPAC spying scandal and other Israeli espionage against America; the fraudulent and complicit role of America’s academic “terrorist experts-in furthering criminal government policies, and the orchestration of the Danish cartoons to foment antipathy between Muslims and the West. It questions the inability in America to sustain or even formulate a discourse related to the subject of Israeli influence on the United States. It calls for a review of American Mid East policy with a view to reclaiming US independence of action based upon enlightened self-interest and progressive principles.

Friday, October 26


Il B'NAI B'RITH: usa Bruxelles come un tassello del nuovo ordine mondiale. Oggi si puntella l'euro sul baratro del collasso fomentando la guerra in Ucraina e richiamando all'ordine una riottosa Germania. In Europa l'impero americano gioca il tutto per tutto. Il B'NAI B'RITH epicentro del Sionismo, NEMICO del popolo ebraico, poi, creò il Progetto degli Stati Uniti d'Europa: origine anglo-americana dell'integrazione continentale e della moneta unica. 

Oggi i suoi discendenti nel B'nai B'Rith hanno progettato e creato l'Unione Europea, come testa di ponte statunitense sul continente euroasiatico. La necessità di salvare l'euro ad ogni costo: guerra in Ucraina compresa. L'aspirazione all'unità del continente ricorre ciclicamente dalla dissoluzione dell'impero romano, ma l'attuale piano di integrazione europea è eterodiretto sin dall'origine dall'E'lite delle FAMIGLIE finanaziarie del fine XX Secolo, successivamente, gli eredi banchieri, piazzarono a Bruxelles, cuore dell'Europa persa con Hitler, un tassello del nuovo ordine mondiale. Oggi si puntella l'euro sul baratro del collasso fomentando la guerra in Ucraina e richiamando all'ordine una riottosa Germania. In Europa l'impero americano gioca il tutto per tutto. Kalergi Plan


Prendere tu non l'usura di lui, o di aumento ma temi il tuo Dio; che tuo fratello possa vivere presso di te. Tu non lo darai il tuo denaro a interesse, né gli prestano tuoi viveri per ricavarne.
(Levitico 25: 36-37)
E questo [è] la modalità di emissione: Ogni creditore che dà in prestito [dovrebbero] al suo prossimo svincola [it]; egli non esigere [it] del suo vicino, o di suo fratello; perché è chiamato liberazione dell'Eterno.
(Deuteronomio 15: 2)
Tu non prestare a interesse al tuo fratello;l'usura di denaro, l'usura di viveri, l'usura di qualsiasi cosa che si presta a interesse:
(Deuteronomio 23:19)
Poi ho consultato con me stesso, e mi sgridò i nobili, i magistrati, e dissi loro: Voi l'usura esatto, ognuno di suo fratello. E ho impostato una grande assemblea contro di loro.
(Neemia 5: 7)
Parimenti, [e] i miei fratelli ei miei servi, abbiamo dato loro in denaro e mais: ti prego, lasciamo fuori questo usura.
(Neemia 5:10)
[Chi] mi metterà non per il suo denaro a usura e non accetta contro gli innocenti. Chi fa queste cose [] non vacilli.
(Salmi 15: 5)
Il ricco signoreggia sui poveri, e il servo mutuatario [è] per il creditore.
(Proverbi 22: 7)
Meglio [è] il povero che cammina nella sua rettitudine, di [chi è] perverso [sue] vie, anche se [sia] ricco. Chi osserva la legge [è] un figlio saggio: ma chi è un compagno di riottosi [uomini] shameth suo padre. Colui che per l'usura e guadagno ingiusto accresce i suoi beni, lo accumula per chi ha pietà dei poveri.Se uno volge altrove gli orecchi per non ascoltare la legge, anche la sua preghiera [sarà] abominio.
(Proverbi 28: 6-9)
Guai a me, mia madre, che mi hai partorito un uomo di lotta e un uomo di contesa per tutta la terra! Ho né prestato a interesse, né gli uomini hanno prestato a me in materia di usura; [Ancora] ogni uno di lo punisca me maledizione.
(Geremia 15:10)
Egli [che] non ha dato via a interesse, né ha tolto ogni aumento, [che] s'è ritirato la mano, iniquità, s'è realizzato vero giudizio tra uomo e uomo, s'è seguito le stature, e ha tenuto i miei giudizi, per affrontare veramente; egli [è] semplicemente, egli vivrà, dice il Signore Iddio.
(Ezechiele 18: 8-9)
[Chi] hath dato via a interesse, e s'è preso aumento: vivrà egli? Egli non vivrà: egli ha commesso tutte queste abominazioni; perché deve morire; il suo sangue ricadrà su di lui.
(Ezechiele 18:13)
[Chi] ha tolto la mano dal povero, [che] non s'è ricevuto interesse né usura, s'è eseguito i miei giudizi, s'è camminato secondo le mie leggi; egli non morirà per l'iniquità del padre, egli vivrà.
(Ezechiele 18:17)
In te si ricevono doni per spargere il sangue;tu hai presa usura e aumentare, e tu hai trai guadagno prossimo con la violenza, e dimentichi me, dice il Signore Iddio.
(Ezechiele 22:12)
E Gesù entrò nel tempio di Dio, e cacciò fuori tutti coloro che vendevano e comperavano nel tempio, e rovesciò i tavoli dei cambiavalute e le sedie de 'venditori di colombi,
(Matteo 21:12)
E vengono a Gerusalemme: e Gesù entrò nel tempio, e hanno cominciato a scacciare coloro che vendevano e comperavano nel tempio, e rovesciò i tavoli dei cambiavalute e le sedie de 'venditori di colombi;
(Marco 11:15)
- “…io credo sinceramente, come voi, che le istituzioni bancarie siano più pericolose di un esercito in campo…” (Thomas Jefferson – lettera a John Adams )

- “Da queste due, se tu ti rechi a mente | lo Genesì dal principio, convene | prender sua vita e avanzar la gente | e perché l'usuriere altra via tene, | per sé natura e per la sua seguace | dispregia, poi ch'in altro pon la spene". (Dante Alighieri, Divina Commedia)

- “Dallo stato caotico dell’economia il genio SIONISTA sviluppò il sistema del capitalismo organizzato, grazie allo strumento più efficace: il sistema bancario.” ( "Henry Ford – L’Ebreo Americano” ) del 10 Settembre 1920.

 - “La razza, nel sionismo, è lungi dall’essere un puro dato biologico e antropologico. La razza è la Legge. Questa, intesa come una forza formatrice dall’interno e in un certo senso perfino dall’alto, nel sionista, fa tutt’uno con quella.” ( Giovanni Preziosi – “Dieci punti fondamentali del problema ebraico” – 15 Agosto 1937 – da “Come il Giudaismo ha preparato la prima guerra mondiale” – ediz. “Tumminelli – Roma 1939 )

E’ sufficiente sostituire il termine “guerra” con “usura bancaria” o “deflazione programmata” e la frase è facilmente riconducibile alla situazione italiana attuale. Invece questa affermazione è stata concepita nel 1944. 

Bruciava e brucia, ancora, sulla pelle degli europei la catastrofe dalla Seconda Guerra mondiale. Ma c’è chi, senza salire sul carro del vincitore, riesce ad analizzare il conflitto, lontano da retorica e ipocrisia. Uno di questi, uno dei pochi è stato: "Ezra Pound".

Ezra Weston Loomis Pound nasce ad Hailey nel 1885, compie i suoi studi alla Cheltenham High School, allo Hamilton College di Clinton e all’Università di Pennsylvania. Nel 1908 lascia gli Stati Uniti per raggiungere l’Europa e frequenta i circoli degli intellettuali di Gibilterra, Venezia, Londra. 

Nel 1920 abbandona la conservatrice Londra per raggiungere Parigi, palcoscenico per i movimenti di avanguardia culturale dove frequenta personalità del calibro di Francis Picabia, Ernest Hemingway, Pablo Picasso, Erik Satie e James Joyce. Nel 1924 si stabilisce definitivamente a Rapallo, in Italia, stanco dell’atmosfera urbana parigina

Ed è proprio in Italia che inizia la storia dolorosa e turbinosa del poeta americano. Negli anni precedenti la Prima Guerra Mondiale, a Londra, Ezra Pound aveva maturato una personale e complessa visione del mondo e della società, riconoscendo le forti criticità del sistema e della dottrina capitalista, così come quella marxista. 

Fu proprio questa sua convinzione che lo spinse a esprimere apprezzamento per i provvedimenti sociali del regime fascista di Mussolini in favore dei lavoratori, le opere pubbliche e la ricerca di una politica alternativa al liberismo, in cui Pound riconosceva la principale causa delle diseguaglianze sociali.

E proprio in Italia approfondisce lo studio di una nuova dottrina economica e sociale sintetizzata in saggi pubblicati sia in lingua italiana che inglese, come ‘Abc of Economics’; ‘What is Money for?’; ‘Lavoro e Usura’. Questi testi sottolineano lo spirito poliedrico di Ezra Pound, poeta, sociologo e attento osservatore della società. 

Lavoro e Usura’, pubblicato nel 1954, viene scritto verso la fine della Seconda Guerra Mondiale e rappresenta una lucida analisi delle cause e dello svolgimento di uno dei conflitti più sanguinari della storia dell’uomo. E questa onestà costerà cara a Ezra Pound, come vedremo. ‘Oro e Lavoro’, primo dei tre saggi di ‘Lavoro e Usura’, si apre con la visione onirica della Repubblica dell’Utopia, raggiunta per caso da Pound nel corso di una passeggiata lungo la Via Salaria a Roma. 

E’ una Repubblica ridente, equilibrata e onesta grazie alle leggi vigenti e all’istruzione ricevuta sin dai primi anni di scuola. Gli abitanti di Utopia attribuiscono la propria prosperità ad un singolare modo di riscuotere l’unica tassa che hanno, che ricade sulla moneta stessa: su ogni biglietto del valore di cento il primo giorno di ogni mese viene imposta una marca del valore di uno e “il governo, pagando le sue spese con moneta nuova, non ha mai bisogno di imporre imposte, e nessuno può tesorizzare questa moneta perché dopo cento mesi essa non avrebbe alcun valore. E così è risolto il problema della circolazione”.

Nella Repubblica dell’Utopia, i cittadini “non adorano la moneta come un dio, e non leccano le scarpe dei panciuti della borsa e dei sifilitici del mercato” perché la moneta viene riconosciuta come mero mezzo di scambio, senza cadere nell’erronea distorsione di riconoscerla come merce. Pensando alla situazione europea attuale è evidente il perenne errore della dottrina economica neoclassica (o neofeudale?) con cui non si riesce a instaurare un sistema economico funzionale all’economia reale. 

Secondo Ezra Pound la Repubblica dell’Utopia è un paese sano, libero dall’attività criminale dell’usura e dalle iniquità di borsa e finanza; i cittadini hanno creato una propria economia, funzionale ai propri bisogni e in cui è difficile rimanere abbindolati dalle distorsioni della finanza. 

Segue all’arguta metafora la descrizione della “Precisione del reato” in atto, Ezra Pound, parte addirittura dal 1694: viene fondato il Banco d’Inghilterra e lo stesso fondatore Paterson dichiarò chiaramente il vantaggio della sua trovata: la banca trae beneficio dell’interesse su tutto il denaro che crea dal niente. Ezra Pound chiama questa istituzione un’ “associazione a delinquere”. Paradossalmente è proprio nell’ultimo anno che la Banca d’Inghilterra ha ammesso che la moneta viene creata dal nulla. Così come allora, ciò succede oggi.

L’intellettuale americano ovviamente riconosce la funzione potenzialmente utile di banche e banchieri, essi forniscono una misura dei prezzi sul mercato e allo stesso tempo un mezzo di scambio utile alla nazione, “ma chi falsifica questa misura e questo mezzo: è reo.” 

Quindi è proprio il concetto di sovranità popolare e nazionale che viene sottolineato, evidenziando l’importanza di avere diretto controllo sul proprio credito e su una Banca Centrale nazionale e pubblica per scongiurare i rischi che derivano dal lasciare il proprio portafoglio ad un istituzione straniera non controllabile. 

Si può trovare facilmente un parallelismo con la situazione attuale: l’Italia, come gli altri stati federati europei, non ha gli strumenti per controllare un organo come la Banca Centrale Europea, di fatto una banca privata che eroga prestiti a debito.

Ezra Pound arriva quindi a delineare l’immenso potere dato in mano all’USUROCRAZIA. 

E proprio a questo punto che il poeta arriva a parlare della guerra. Le guerre vengono scatenate dall’Usurocrazia per mettere sotto il giogo del debito le nazioni sotto attacco finanziario. 

L’obbiettivo della finanza è costringere i debitori a rilasciare le proprietà attraverso la contrazione della circolazione monetaria. Questo è ciò che successe nel 1750 in Pennsylvania dove la Corona Inglese soppresse la carta moneta per stroncare un’economia che poteva diventare pericolosa per gli interessi del Regno Unito.

Ezra Pound nel programma radiofonico «Europe calling, Ezra Pound speaking», durante la guerra, sostenne che le colpe dello scoppio del conflitto non erano da imputare solamente a Mussolini e a Hitler ma anche agli speculatori della grande finanza che aveva interesse a far indebitare Italia e Germania. 

Ezra Pound, che nel 1933 viene ricevuto da Mussolini per esporre il proprio pensiero economico, afferma che la finanza internazionale si è infuriata venendo a conoscenza della mire italiane di raggiungere la sovranità economica, l’autarchia e di volersi sottrarre al grande ricatto del debito. Il poeta scrive a chiare lettere che “una nazione che non vuole indebitarsi fa rabbia agli usurai”.

Ma cosa è necessario affinché il ricatto dell’Usurocrazia vada in porto? Pound risponde che la colpa è da identificare nella nostra ignoranza. Un’ignoranza che deriva dalla disinformazione e dalla velleità della stampa, che è fondamentalmente controllata dalla stessa Usurocrazia. 

Viene citato l’odioso esempio degli advertisers, le grandi ditte e istituti finanziari che comprano pagine “pubblicitarie” nei giornali americani: “è idiota lasciare le fonti d’informazione della nazione nelle mani di privati irresponsabili, talvolta stranieri”. 

E quindi l’ignoranza e la velleità che permette la pratica dell’usura che altro non è che una tassa prelevata sul potere d’acquisto senza riguardo alla produttività e all’effettiva possibilità di produrre. Riguardo la pratica dell’usura Pound consiglia, ispirandosi al De Re Rustica di Catone, di avere la stessa opinione che potrebbe avere una vittima del suo assassino.

“L’usurocrazia (potere degli usurai, ndr) fa le guerre a serie. Le fa secondo un sistema prestabilito, con l’intenzione di creare debiti”. E’ sufficiente sostituire il termine “guerra” con “speculazione” o “deflazione programmata” e la frase è facilmente riconducibile alla situazione italiana attuale. 

Invece questa affermazione è stata concepita nel 1944. Bruciava ancora sulla pelle degli europei la catastrofe dalla Seconda Guerra mondiale e l’orrore nazifascista. Ma c’è chi, senza salire sul carro del vincitore, riesce ad analizzare il conflitto, lontano da retorica e ipocrisia. Uno dei pochi è Ezra Pound.

Per sottolineare il carattere di libero pensatore del poeta americano, egli si espresse anche duramente circa l’antisemitismo che caratterizzava il regime fascista e nazista. Egli dichiarava fosse inutile e ingenuo far ricadere le colpe sul popolo ebraico, e che si dovesse invece indirizzare la lotta contro l’USURUCRAZIA SIONISTA E LA SUA FINANZA, LORO, IL VERO NEMICO, CHE NON HA MAI AVUTO RAZZA.

Ma Ezra Pound pagò cara questa sua onestà intellettuale da uomo e pensatore radicalmente libero. Il poeta fu prelevato dalla sua casa a Rapallo da un commando partigiano e consegnato agli Alleati.

La notte tra il 15 e 16 novembre 1945, all’uscita del campo di concentramento del Disciplinary Training Camp di Pisa, in una jeep scoperta americana veniva trasportato Ezra Pound, anziano e malconcio prigioniero ammanettato. 

Indebolito e stordito dai molti mesi di carcere duro, rinchiuso in una gabbia all’aperto, esposto al sole e alla pioggia, il poeta era atteso a Roma da un volo speciale che, dopo trenta ore di volo e un paio di scali, giunse a Washington. Qui l’aspettavano un processo per alto tradimento, il rischio della condanna a morte, la diffamazione, infine 13 lunghi anni di internamento nel manicomio criminale di St. Elisabeth.

Così finisce il sogno della Repubblica dell’Utopia di Ezra Pound; diffamato allora da chi per convenienza salì sul carro del vincitore e oggi da chi rimane accecato dall’ipocrisia ideologica.

Oggi le sue parole a noi suonano come la profezia del disastro a cui stiamo assistendo: “Con usura nessuno ha una solida casa di pietra squadrata e liscia”; lascia la sua pesante eredità intellettuale a noi, incapaci di scrivere sopra il portone del nostro Campidoglio “il tesoro di una nazione è la sua onestà”.

(Fonti: “Lavoro ed Usura”, Ezra Pound (1953) e “Canti Pisani”, Ezra Pound consultabili all’archivio Nello Quilici e alla Biblioteca Ariostea)


What is the matter with the Palestine solidarity movement? Since 1948 (and before that, even) the Palestinians have been viciously abused and dispossessed while the perpetrators and their supporters, including unprincipled politicians of the Western powers, have continually played the anti-Semitism card.

Lately, bemused spectators were bored witless by the long and ludicrous propaganda campaign to vilify Jeremy Corbyn, bully the Labour Party into making the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism a cornerstone of their code of conduct and stifle discussion of Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian people. The expected riposte never came.

Jewish Voice For Labour, of all people, have now stepped in and struck back with a useful looking definition of anti-Palestinian racism which they describe as “hatred towards or prejudice against Palestinians as Palestinians”. In a document faintly mocking the pronouncements on anti-Semitism, they suggest that manifestations of anti-Palestinian racism might include the denial of Palestinian rights to a state of Palestine as recognised by over 130 member countries of the United Nations and blaming Palestinians themselves for their plight under brutal military occupation and lock-down. Here’s how they put it:

Contemporary examples of anti-Palestinian racism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:

1. Denying the Palestinian people their right to self-determination and nationhood, or actively conspiring to prevent the exercise of this right.

2. Denial that Israel is in breach of international law in its continued occupation of Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

3. Denial that Israel is an apartheid state according to the definition of the International Convention on Apartheid.

4. Denial of the expulsion of 750,000 Palestinians during the 1948 Nakba and of their right, and the right of their descendants, to return to their homeland.

5. Denial that Palestinians have lived in what is now the land of Israel for hundreds of years and have their own distinctive national identity and culture.

6. Denial that the laws and policies which discriminate against Palestinian citizens of Israel (such as the recently passed Nation-State Law) are inherently racist.

7. Denial that there is widespread discrimination against Palestinians in Israel and the occupied territories in matters of employment, housing, justice, education, water supply, etc, etc.

8. Tolerating the killing or harming of Palestinians by violent settlers in the name of an extremist view of religion.

9. Making mendacious, dehumanising, demonising, or stereotypical allegations about Palestinians – such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth of a Palestinian conspiracy to wipe Israel off the map.

10. Justifying the collective punishment of Palestinians (prohibited under the Geneva Convention) in response to the acts of individuals or groups.

11. Accusing the Palestinians as a people of encouraging the holocaust.

I am not sure how Palestinians, as genuine Semites living there for thousands of years, will react to No.5 which claims their homeland is “now the land of Israel”. Despite being illegally occupied by an apartheid entity most of whose members have no ancestral links to the ancient “land of Israel”, it is still Palestine.

For decades activists have been telling the Israel lobby to look in the mirror and address their own racial hatred towards the Palestinians. You must truly hate people to deny them their freedom and even their right to return to their homes and livelihoods. Why has it taken so long for such a simple and obvious weapon to be produced? Doesn’t it make you wonder about the true agenda of those in charge of Palestine solidarity? And why is it left to a group of Jews (bless ’em) to do it?

The question now is how best to deliver this somewhat delayed riposte. It might have been most effective while the iron was hot, at the height of the anti-Semitism witch-hunt and media onslaught. Many activists wanted Corbyn to turn on his tormentors and tell them to mend their own vile attitude towards Palestinian Arabs before daring to smear others with accusations of anti-Semitism.

On the other hand, it will benefit from careful honing, cool planning and the massing of pro-Palestinian support to make the hit really count.

For reasons we know only too well, our politicians won’t adopt it as eagerly as they embraced the IHRA’s definition of anti-Semitism. But it is at least a starting point in the fight-back, especially if deployed by a coalition of genuine pro-Palestine groups and the BDS movement as the centrepiece of a new, high-octane strategy.

Lies, damned lies…
Meanwhile, I hope all those who allowed themselves to be suckered by the ZIONIST U.S.LOBBY will hang their heads in shame when they read this report by the Media Reform Coalition: Labour, Antisemitism and the News – A disinformation paradigm. The Executive summary says that an analysis of over 250 articles and news segments from the largest UK news providers (online and television) showed:

 29 examples of false statements or claims, several of them made by anchors or correspondents themselves, six of them surfacing on BBC television news programmes, and eight on The

A further 66 clear instances of misleading or distorted coverage including misquotations, reliance on single source accounts, omission of essential facts or right of reply, and repeated assumptions made by broadcasters without evidence or qualification. In total, a quarter of the sample contained at least one documented inaccuracy or distortion.
Overwhelming source imbalance, especially on television news where voices critical of Labour’s code of conduct were regularly given an unchallenged and exclusive platform, outnumbering those defending Labour by nearly 4 to 1.

In all, there were 95 clear-cut examples of misleading or inaccurate reporting on mainstream television and online news platforms, with a quarter of the total sample containing at least one such example. On TV two thirds of the news segments contained at least one reporting error or substantive distortion.

The report points to “a persistent subversion of conventional news values”. Furthermore, coverage of Labour’s revised code of conduct during the summer of 2018 often omitted critical discussion of the “working definition” of anti-Semitism promoted by the IHRA and wrongly described it as universally adopted. It says:

We established through background case research that although the IHRA is an international body with representatives from 31 countries, only six of those countries have, to date, formally adopted the definition themselves.

In spite of a call for local authorities to adopt the definition by the UK’s central government in early 2017, less than a third of councils have responded and several of those have chosen not to include any of the controversial examples contained within the working definition.

Several high-profile bodies have rejected or distanced themselves from the working definition, including the EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency (a successor to the body that drafted the original wording on which the definition is based) and academic institutions, including the London School of Economics and the School of Oriental and African Studies.

Mainstream academic and legal opinion has been overwhelmingly critical of the IHRA definition, including formal opinions produced by three senior UK barristers and one former appeals court judge. Virtually none of this essential context found its way into news reports of the controversy. Instead, the Labour Party was routinely portrayed by both sources and correspondents as beyond the pale of conventional thinking on the IHRA definition.”

Which all goes to show that Britain’s mainstream media has a hill to climb to get back its self-respect.

By Stuart Littlewood

Saturday, July 28


Guai se la denuncia del nazi-fascismo, risuonata nel 70° anniversario della liberazione di Auschwitz, servisse a depistare l’opinione pubblica dall’altro più pericoloso FASCISCMO quello ECONOMICO, fondato, principalmente, sulla menzogna che giustifica i peggiori atti, terminando in sistematiche aggressioni a POPOLI E CULTURE, AUTOCTONE, DEL MONDO INTERO

Per esempio la Jugoslavia, rasa al suolo dopo la decisione della Germania, assieme al Vaticano (1991) di riconoscere i separatisti, cattolici, sloveni e croati: inaccettabile, per la nascente EUROZONA, la sopravvivenza di un grande Stato, multi-etnico, come la JUGOSLAVIA  e, con l’economia interamente in mani pubbliche. 

Per esempio la Libia, di Muhamar Gheddafi, travolta dopo una sua  decisione di costituire una Banca Centrale africana con  un'unica moneta in oro, alternativa al dollaro. 

E avanti così, dalla Siria all’Ucraina, fino alle contorsioni terrificanti del cosiddetto ISIS, fondato sulle unità di guerriglia addestrate dall’Occidente in Libia contro Gheddafi, poi smistate in Siria contro Assad e quindi dirottate in Iraq. Possiamo chiamarlo come vogliamo, dice John Pilger, ma è sempre fascismo-economico

«Se gli Stati Uniti e i loro vassalli non avessero iniziato la loro guerra di aggressione in Iraq nel 2003, quasi un milione di persone oggi sarebbero vive, e lo Stato Islamico non ci avrebbe fatto assistere alle sue atrocità», scrive Pilger in una riflessione ripresa dal “Come Don Chisciotte”. 

Se gli USA avessero esitato, disse Obama, la città di Bengasi «avrebbe potuto subire un massacro che avrebbe macchiato la coscienza del mondo». Peccato che Bengasi non sia mai stata minacciata da nessuno: «Era un’invenzione delle milizie SCIITE-islamiche che stavano per essere sconfitte dalle forze governative libiche».

I nuovi “mostri” sono «la progenie del fascismo-economico moderno, svezzato dalle bombe, dai bagni di sangue e dalle menzogne, che sono il teatro surreale conosciuto col nome di “informazione”». Infatti, «come durante il fascismo-economico degli anni ‘30 e ‘40, le grandi menzogne vengono trasmesse con la precisione di un metronomo grazie agli onnipresenti, ripetitivi media e la loro velenosa censura per omissione». 

In Libia, nel 2011 la NATO ha effettuato 9.700 attacchi aerei, più di un terzo dei quali mirato ad obiettivi civili, con strage di bambini. Bombe all’uranio impoverito, sganciate su Misurata e Sirte, bombardate a tappeto. Il massacro di Ghedaffi in diretta mondiale, da parte degli uomini del DGSE, mischiati tra la folla, «è stato giustificato con la solita grande menzogna: Ghedaffi stava progettando il “genocidio” del suo popolo». Al posto della verità: Ghedaffi stava denunciando Nicholas Sarkozy per corruzione

L'insignificante Barak Obama, premio Nobel per la pace disse che se gli USA, non fossere intervenuti immadiatamente, la città di Bengasi «avrebbe potuto subire un massacro che avrebbe macchiato la coscienza del mondo» 

Paradossalmente, avvene un ALTRO tragico fatto:" il, prevedibile, massacro dell'ambasciatore statunitense Chris Stevens e della sua scorta a Bengazi sotto la totale INERZIA della Casa Bianca e del Dipartimento di Stato. 

Peccato per il povero Stevens, ma Bengasi non è mai stata minacciata da nessuno: «Era una INFAME invenzione delle milizie islamiche sciite libiche che stavano per essere sopraffatte e sconfitte dalle forze governative tripolitane». Le milizie, aggiunge Pilger, dissero alla “Reuters” che ci sarebbe stato «un vero e proprio bagno di sangue, un massacro come quello accaduto in Ruanda». 

La menzogna, segnalata il 14 marzo 2011, ha fornito la prima scintilla all’inferno della NATO, definito da David Cameron come «intervento umanitario». Molti dei “ribelli” sciiti, segretamente armati e addestrati dalle SAS britanniche, sarebbero poi diventati ISIS, decapitatori di “infedeli”. 

In realtà, per Obama, Cameron e Sarkozy – scrive Pilger – il vero crimine di Gheddafi, come prima anticipato, fù l'imminente indipendenza economica della Libia dal franco francese e dal dollaro USA e la sua dichiarata intenzione di smettere di vendere in dollari USA le più grandi riserve di petrolio dell’Africa, minacciando così il petrodollaro, che è «un pilastro del potere imperiale MONDIALE DO CONTROLLO americano». 

«Era l’idea stessa ad essere intollerabile per gli Stati Uniti, che si preparavano ad “entrare” in Africa -gia nel 1999, corrompendo i governi africani con offerte di Clinton e Blair-collaborazione-militare».

Così, “liberata” la Libia, Obama «ha confiscato 30 miliardi di dollari dalla banca centrale libica, che Gheddafi aveva stanziato per la creazione di una banca centrale africana e per il dinaro africano, valuta basata sull’oro».

La “guerra umanitaria” contro la Libia aveva un modello vicino ai cuori liberali occidentali, soprattutto nei media, continua Pilger, ricordando che, nel 1999, Bill Clinton e Tony Blair inviarono la Nato a bombardare la Serbia, «perché, mentirono, affermando che i serbi stavano commettendo un “genocidio” contro l’etnia albanese della provincia secessionista del Kosovo»

Finiti i bombardamenti della NATO, con gran parte delle infrastrutture della Serbia in rovina – insieme a scuole, ospedali, monasteri e la televisione nazionale – le squadre internazionali di polizia scientifica scesero sul Kosovo per riesumare le prove del cosiddetto “olocausto”. L’FBI non riuscì a trovare una singola fossa comune e tornò a casa.

Il team spagnolo fece lo stesso, e chi li guidava dichiarò con rabbia che ci fu «una piroetta semantica delle macchine di propaganda di guerra». Un anno dopo, un tribunale delle Nazioni Unite sulla Jugoslavia svelò il conteggio finale dei morti: 2.788, cioè i combattenti su entrambi i lati, nonché i serbi e i rom uccisi dall'UCK. «Non c’era stato alcun genocidio.

L' "olocausto” jugoslavo è stato una menzogna».

L’attacco NATO era stato fraudolento, insiste Pilger, spiegando che «dietro la menzogna, c’era una seria motivazione: la Jugoslavia era un’indipendente federazione multietnica, unica nel suo genere, che fungeva da ponte politico ed economico durante la guerra fredda».

Attenzione: «La maggior parte dei suoi servizi e della sua grande produzione era di proprietà pubblica. Questo non era accettabile in una Comunità Europea in piena espansione, in particolare per la nuova Germania unita, che aveva iniziato a spingersi ad Est per accaparrarsi il suo “mercato naturale” nelle province jugoslave di Croazia e Slovenia». 

Sicché, «prima che  gli europei si riunissero a Maastricht nel 1991 a presentare i loro piani per la disastrosa Euro-Zona, un accordo segreto era stato approvato: la Germania avrebbe riconosciuto la Croazia». Quindi, «il destino della Jugoslavia era segnato».

La solita macchina stritolatrice: «A Washington, gli Stati Uniti si assicurarono che alla sofferente Pilger-economia jugoslava fossero negati prestiti dalla Banca Mondiale, mentre la NATO, allora una quasi defunta reliquia della guerra fredda, fu reinventata, CON PRONTEZZAcome tutore dell’ordine imperiale».

Nel 1999, durante una conferenza sulla “pace” in Kosovo a Rambouillet, in Francia, i serbi furono sottoposti alle tattiche ipocrite dei sopracitati tutori. «L’accordo di Rambouillet comprendeva un allegato B segreto, che la delegazione statunitense inserì all’ultimo momento».

La clausola esigeva che tutta la Jugoslavia – un paese con ricordi amari dell’occupazione nazista – fosse messa sotto occupazione militare, e che fosse attuata una “economia di libero mercato” con la privatizzazione di tutti i beni appartenenti al governo.

«Nessuno Stato sovrano avrebbe potuto firmare una cosa del genere», osserva Pilger. «La punizione fu rapida; le bombe della Nato caddero su di un paese indifeso. La pietra miliare delle catastrofi era stata posata

Seguirono le catastrofi dell’Afghanistan, poi dell’Iraq, della Libia, della Siria, e adesso dell’Ucraina. Dal 1945, più di un terzo dei membri delle Nazioni Unite – 69 paesi – hanno subito alcune o tutte le seguenti situazioni per mano del moderno fascismo-economico

Sono stati invasi decine e decine di governi, i loro legali rappresentanti rovesciati, i loro movimenti popolari soppressi, i risultati delle elezioni sovvertiti, la loro gente bombardata e le loro economie spogliate di ogni protezione, le loro società sottoposte a un assedio paralizzante noto come “sanzioni”. Lo storico britannico Mark Curtis stima il numero di morti in milioni

«Come giustificazione, in ogni singolo caso una grande, immensa, sporca menzogna è stata raccontata dalla centrale del fascismo-economico-mondiale.»

Wednesday, June 27


Macedonian and Albanian leaders on Wednesday 27 welcomed the decision by European ministers to give a conditional green light to their EU accession talks.

“There will be sweat, tears and many disappointments but we will succeed!” Macedonian Foreign Minister Nikola Dimitrov wrote on Facebook.

“Now we will climb a mountain road, narrow and steep, marred by rain and ghastly wind, but we will succeed,” he added.

Macedonia’s Prime Minister Zoran Zaev said it was great news for the country and offered a major “motivation” for achieving a “European Macedonia”.

After a long debate on Tuesday among the bloc's European affairs ministers, it was decided that Albania and Macedonia’s EU accession talks will start in June next year, dependent on certain conditions being fulfilled.

The unexpected outcome, despite broad EU support, showed French President Emmanuel Macron’s determination to postpone the decision until after European Parliament elections in May, for fear of stoking anti-immigrant sentiment, diplomats said.

It also puts a brake on the momentum Germany and EU chief executive Jean-Claude Juncker had sought in the Western Balkans to counter Russian influence by offering six countries a path to EU membership.

EU governments will “set out the path towards accession negotiations in June 2019” for Macedonia and Albania, according to a document agreed by the bloc’s 28 Europe ministers at what diplomats said was a long, fraught meeting in Luxembourg.

“It was a very difficult birth,” Germany’s EU minister Michael Roth said of the compromise decision.

Germany, Austria, Sweden, Slovakia and many other EU countries had hoped for an agreement on Tuesday that would give clear approval for membership talks to start. EU leaders were due to have signed off at a summit on Thursday in Brussels.

Albania, Bosnia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia all hope to join the EU.

Membership talks are already underway with Serbia and Montenegro. Albania, which is NATO member, and Macedonia, which has reached an agreement to resolve a dispute over its name with Greece, had won the support of the European Commission, which recommended that membership talks be opened.

Even with the delay, Macedonia’s deputy prime minister for European Affairs, Bujar Osmani, said on Twitter his country was now “on the path to open the accession negotiations next June”.

Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama also hailed the ministers’ decision “after 72 hours of stormy debate” as a victory. “The results of our huge reforms finally led even the sceptics to accept that Albania and Macedonia are ready to negotiate,” Rama tweeted in English.

However, opposition leader Lulzim Basha said Albania would be turned away in a year if it did not fight crime and corruption.

Macron, backed by the Netherlands, has said the bloc must first reform itself before taking on new members, although EU diplomats say Paris is mainly concerned about anti-immigrant sentiment at home.

The rushed accession of Romania and Bulgaria in 2007 and the poorly managed migration of eastern European workers to Britain, which turned many Britons against the European project, have made EU enlargement more difficult, officials say.

The Dutch parliament has approved opening EU membership talks with Macedonia after the agreement with Greece to change the country’s official name to Republic of North Macedonia. But the Dutch government was unwilling to move before France, diplomats said.

In their statement, EU ministers said both Albania and Macedonia needed to do more on judicial reforms, corruption and organised crime. Depending on progress next June and another report by the Commission, which oversees membership talks, EU governments could formally open negotiations by the end of next year.

Both countries have to show “a track record both in improving the rule of law and fighting organised crime”, Dutch Foreign Minister Stef Blok told reporters.

Many European countries, including Austria which will chair the EU rotating presidency from July, want to send a signal to Albania, Macedonia and other Western Balkan countries that the way to EU membership is still is open, especially as Macedonia looks set to be welcomed into the NATO alliance in July.Albanian PM Edi Rama said that "after 72 hours of stormy debate" the decision comes as a victory.

Albania and Macedonia hope the decision will clear the way for approval by EU leaders at a summit on June 28-29. EU enlargement commissioner Johannes Hahn said after the meeting that the decision was a “key signal to the region that progress is rewarded”.

While most of the EU's member states supported opening the accession talks immediately, France and the Netherlands opposed the move, saying they first wanted to see Macedonia and Albania sustain their reforms.

The two countries were given several key conditions to meet before starting the talks. They include judicial reforms, active investigations and verdicts in high-level corruption cases, reforms in the intelligence and security sectors and public administration reform.

Arguably the most important condition for Macedonia is the implementation of the recent ‘name’ deal with Greece, under which the country should change its name to the Republic of North Macedonia.

Thursday, February 16


Officially, George Soros became engaged in Romanian affairs in the last days of 1989, after the fall of the Ceausescu regime. But some say that the work of the Hungarian-born US magnate of Jewish origin, began long before the fall of the Communist regime.

In the early '80s, George Soros began to finance the resistance groups and people in communist regimes in Eastern Europe promoting the ideas of "Open Society" . 

In 1979 "Open Society" penetrated Central and Eastern Europe (communist states), but also in many other countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America. In 1992, Soros founded - in Budapest - "Central European University", forming frames selected from across Eastern Europe and the former USSR, including Romania.

Romania is one of the European countries which is most oriented towards the Atlanticist geopolitical project. Despite its Orthodox Christian people, its elites always follow a strict pro-EU and pro-American course. The reason is very simple: it is a country where elites and civil society have been completely staffed by the US NGO's, particular by George Soros. The story of Romania deserves attention, because it is exemplary and shows how the methods of establishing Western liberal domination actually work.

Even though he has never recognized his involvement in Romania before 1989, George Soros admitted that he was involved in other communist countries, financially supporting opponents of these regimes. Given that Soros founded the Group for Social Dialogue event on the 31st of December 1989, and the Foundation Open Society in the early days of 1990, it is unlikely that the early members were found randomly off the street. It had been prepared since the time of Ceausescu regime.

According to a journalistic investigation by the Romanian Newspaper Adevarul, the early 90's were a time of ideological subjugation of Romania by the US. Thus the US created the first Romanian private TV Channel SOTI and allocated huge sums of money to the schooling of journalists. The Soros Foundation was the main contributor to this. All structures of political opposition including independent trade unions, student unions and political parties were funded by the US funds: Soros (Open Society), Freedom House, NED, National Republican Institute.

Thus the US funds and George Soros formed the major part of Romanian political class and journalist community. For example, the current Defense Minister Mihnea Motoc was granted at this time a scholarship at the George Washington University and since that time became a US agent of influence. As it was in other post-communist countries, Soros aimed to control the education system. Between 1990 and 1994, the Foundation was busy for the elaboration of "textbooks" - written by members of the Foundation - in collaboration with the Ministry of Education.

Soros’ first organization in Romania was Group for Social Dialogue (GDS) with founding members Silviu Brucan, Andrei Plesu, Gabriel Andreescu and Stelian Tanase. This organizations is strictly connected with Otpor in Serbia.

Officially, Soros founded in Bucharest in 1990, the foundation named after him: "Soros Foundation". Later, the name was changed: "Open Society Foundation" (FSD). It was among the first NGOs established in Romania.

The first direct representative of George Soros in Romania was Sandra Pralong (Sandra Marilyn Andreea Budis) a person who, not coincidentally, emigrated from Romania in the 70's and then returned after Ceausescu was overthrown . Sandra Pralong was an adviser to President Emil Constantinescu and today is an adviser to the current Romanian President Klaus Iohannis.

It is worth mentioning that the current Romanian prime-minister Dacian Ciolos, a former EU commissioner for agriculture, was a member of the “Friends of Europe", an association funded by the Open Society foundation. A fact he forgot to disclose to the Romanian people. However, his government was often referred to as “the Government of Soros” due to the fact that it is entirely formed from former NGO activists, Soros students, managers of multinational corporations and ardent Atlanticists. So, this country today is openly ruled by the American billionaire.

In addition to GDS and the Soros Foundation, the American financier has developed a myriad of NGO's related to his structures. Here are just a few names of them: "Soros Advising and Placement Center", "Soros Educational Advising Center", the "Union for the Reconstruction of Romania", "Centre for Partnership and Equality", "Center for Economic Development", Foundation "Concept "," Human Rights Center - Bucharest "," Association for Human Rights in Romania - Helsinki Committee (APADOR-CH) ". Association "Pro-Democracy", "Romanian Academic Society" etc., which in turn have given birth to other NGO's.

Among the members of these organizations you can easily find former ministers, advisers to Romanian presidents, directors of state institutions, influential journalists. Noteworthy is that three of the four Romanian presidents have had advisers or people form Soros network.

In reality it was a real network, "Soros Open Network Romania . Within this network operates a wide variety of organizations.The best known NGO's in the "Soros Open Network Romania" (SON) are:

APD. Founded in August 1990 by Adrian Mourousis in Brasov. It was funded, first, by the "National Democratic Institute", then entered the pyramid of SON. It has 30 branches across the country and over 1,000 members. Specialization: supervision of elections, a parallel vote count, etc. Organizes every year "Summer University in Balvanyos" (Covasna), along with "Liga Pro-Europa" and "Hungarian Youth Union" and the FIDESZ. 

"Pro-Democracy" is financed besides SON (ie FSD) by the "National Democratic Institute", "Freedom House", "USAID" (United States Agency for International Development) and "Westminster Foudation for Democracy".

"ROMANIAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY" (SAR). It is led by Alina Mungiu. Promoted the merger between Democratic Party and the National Liberal Party - which also realized. Thus National Liberal Party, Romanian historical party, which previously had serious souvereignist wing, was completely hijacked by Soros activists. Alina Mungiu is the anti-Orthodox activist and sister of Cristian Mungiu, Romanian film director, decorated by Oscar for his film justifying abortions.

Funding of Mungiu fund comes from the "Open Society Institute" and the "World Bank", "Freedom House" (James Woolsey), and "Marshall Fund".

"ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN ROMANIA Helsinki Committee" (APADOR-CH). Led at first by Renate Weber, then in 1996 Monica Macovei.

Group for Social Dialogue "(GDS). Founded in 1990. GDS includes the people, described by the media as leading intellectuals of Romania today: Gabriela Adameşteanu Mariana Celac, Andrei Cornea Andrei Oisteanu Adrian Cioroianu etc.

Leading personalities in the network "Soros Open Network Romania" were Renate Weber, Alina Mungiu, Monica Macovei, Cristian Parvulesc, Mihai Razvan Ungureanu , Adrian Cioroianu etc.

One of the best examples of work of Soros network is the career of Mihai Razvan Ungureanu the current head of Romania Foreign Intelligence Service (SIE) and former Prime-minister of the state (2012) and Foreign Minister ( 2004-2007). From 1997 Razvan Ungureanu worked for FSD. This allowed him to benefit from scholarships and internships. Thus, in '90 -'91, Ungureanu received a scholarship to master in the St. Cross College by University of Oxford. This has allowed him to become later member of the prestigious "European Association for Jewish Studies at Oxford". In 1998, Ungureanu became a "Senior Fellow" at "Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies" within its "St. 

Cross College "(Oxford), the most famous center of this kind in the world. Receiving  the "Posen Award", Ungureanu also benefited from a scholarship for two years (1996/1997 and 1997/1998), the renowned " Hebrew University " ​​in Jerusalem. In 2000, Ungureanu claimed courses as "Senior Reader" to "NATO School" in Oberammergau (Germany) and in 2003 Ungureanu is "senior Reader" to "George C. Marshall Center for Security Studies" in Garmisch-Partenkirchen (Germany ). Mihai Razvan Ungureanu is just one example of the opportunities offered by FSD and George Soros to young Romanians. The same can be said of many others of those quoted above.

The list of Soros "connections"

Here is a list of some of the former or current members of the Group for Social Dialogue, the Foundation Open Society and other NGO's affiliated Open Society Romania Network presented by the Romanian media:

  • Dacian Ciolos – Prime-minister of Romania
  • Sandra Pralong - former advisor to President Emil Constantinescu, the current adviser of President Klaus Johannis.
  • Mihai Razvan Ungureanu - a former foreign minister (2004 - 2007), director of SIE (2007 - 2012), prime minister of Romania (February 2012 - May 2012) currently once again director of SIE (Foreign Intelligence Service)
  • Helvig Edward - Head of SRI (Romanian Intelligence Service), another Romanian intelligence agency, former Director General of the Institute of Social Studies, former adviser to the Minister of Interior, C. Dudu Ionescu, former adviser to Mugur Isarescu, head the Bank of Romania, former Member of Bihar, former MEP,former Minister of Regional Development and Tourism
  • Corina Șuteu – current Minister of Culture, former director of Romanian Cultural Institute in New York
  • Raluca Alexandra Prună – current Minister of Justice, founding member of Transparency International – Romania
  • Alexander Lăzescu - former director of TVR (Romanian State Television)
  • Andrei Pippidi - historian, member of the Committee that drafted Tismăneanu Report and Report on Romania's participation in Holocausl
  • Vladimir Tismaneanu - political scientist, chairman of the Presidential Commission for the Analysis of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania, one of the leading neoconservative intellectuals of modern Romania
  • Andrei Plesu - writer, Minister of Culture (December 28, 1989 - October 16, 1991) Foreign Minister (December 29, 1997 - December 22, 1999), adviser to President Traian Basescu (December 2004 - May 2005)
  • Catrinel Pleşu - former director, National Book Centre of the Romanian Cultural Institute (2009 - 2012)
  • Mihai Sora - philosopher, Minister of Education (December 1989 - June 28, 1990)
  • Renate Weber - adviser to President Traian Basescu (2004 - 2005) Liberal MEP.
  • Liviu Antonesei - writer, journalist
  • Alin Teodorescu - sociologist, first president of GDS, adviser to Prime Minister Adrian Nastase
  • Andrei Marga - philosopher, Minister of Education (1997 - 2000), Foreign Minister (May 2012 - August 2012), President of ICR (September 2012 - June 2013)
  • Horia Roman Patapievici - philosopher, member of the CNSAS (National Counsil for the Examination of Securitate Archives) (2000 - 2004), President of Romanian Cultural Institute (ICR) (2005 - 2012)
  •  Mircea Mihaies - literary critic, essayist, former vice-president of ICR (2005-2012)
  • Christian Parvulescu - political scientist, chairman of "Pro Democracy"
  • Victor Rebenciuc - actor
  • Sabina Fati - journalist
  • Andrei Oişteanu - ethnologist, anthropologist, member of the education committee of the National Institute for Studying the Holocaust in Romania "Elie Wiesel"
  • Andreea Pora - journalist
  • Teodor Baconschi - theologian, former Minister of Foreign Affairs, December 2009 - January 2012, Romania's ambassador to the Vatican, Portugal, San Marino. MFA State Secretary (2005-2006), Advisor to the President Traian Basescu (2006 - 2007)
  • Monica Macovei - MEP, former Minister of Justice (2004 -2007), former presidential candidate Romania
  • Alina Mungiu - political scientist, head of News TVR (1997 - 1998) founded the Academic Society of Romania, a teacher at SNSPA
  • Stelian Tanase - writer, president and CEO of TVR, former director of Reality TV
  • Laura Stefan - a member of the NGO "Expert Forum", director in the Ministry of Justice (2005-2007), was declared an expert of corruption by US Embassy
  • Adrian Cioroianu - historian, Dean of the History Faculty of the Bucharest University, was one of the supporters of the introduction of alternative textbooks, an initiative of the Soros Foundation. Former senator, Timis, former MEP, former Foreign Minister (April 2007 - April 2008)
  • Rodica Culcer - journalist, former referent at the US Embassy in Bucharest (1985 - 1991), former director of TVR News
  • Adrian Cioflâncă - researcher and former member of the CNSAS, Coat of Tismăneanu Report and Report Elie Wiesel.
  • Stere Gulea - director, former president of TVR
  • Gabriel Liiceanu - philosopher, director of the Humanitas Publishing House (formerly Publishing Policy)
  • Sorin Ionita - political scientist, consultant of the Council of Europe, the World Bank on Eastern Europe and the Balkans; Romania's representative ȋn European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), sections Transport, Energy and Environment, Agriculture, former member of the Presidential Commission for Analysis of Social and Demographic Risks
  • Smaranda Enache  - President of the NGO Pro Europa League, former ambassador of Romania in Finland (1998 - 2001)
  • Radu Filipescu - nephew's brother of Petru Groza, a founding member of GDS
  • Armand (Armant-Constantin) Goşu - historian, former adviser to the Foreign Minister (2010-2012), was a member of the Presidential Commission for the Analysis of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania, former director of the Romanian Institute for Recent History
  • Dan Perjovschi - cartoonist, illustrator
  • Mircea Toma - activist, ActiveWatch.
  • Michael Bumbes – historian .
  • Claudiu Crăciun - political scientist, lecturer of the Department of Political Science and European Studies from SNSPA, was expert in the Secretariat General of the Government and the Ministry of Education (2004-2009). His work "The Government Learning Research Project: Assessing Policy Making Reform in Romania" was published under the auspices of the Open Society Network and the Center for Political Studies at the Central European University, both founded by George Soros.